Search Results for "Narcotics"

234 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 234 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 42(2) Mandatory Requirement. Secret Information Not Reduced to Writing and Sent to Superior Officer, Vitiated Trial.

The appellant, Bhola Vijayprasad Gupta, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Washim, on 27.01.2006 in Sessions Trial 4/2003 for offences un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sections 42 and 50 of NDPS Act, 1985. Conviction for Possession of 85.810 kg Ganja Set Aside as Mandatory Search and Seizure Procedures Were Not Followed.

The appellants, Mobin Khan and Taslim Khan, were convicted by the learned District Judge-6 and Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur in Special (N.D.P.S.)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 50 and Other Mandatory Provisions. Failure to Inform Accused of Right to be Searched Before Gazetted Officer or Magistrate Renders Search Illegal and Conviction Unsustainable.

The appellants, Raju Dhanju Rathod and Ramesh Liganna Mudraj, were convicted by the Special Court for NDPS, Bombay, for offences under Section 20(c) r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Forfeiture of Flat Under NDPS Act Due to Res Judicata and Delay. Earlier Dismissal of Writ Petitions and SLP Bar Re-agitation of Same Issues Under Article 226.

The petitioners, Smt. Gulbanu Hassanali Rupani (aged 85) and Smt. Hasina S. Hemani, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 226 of the Constituti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Test Reports Under Drugs and Cosmetics Act in NDPS Prosecution. Section 25(2) of Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 applies only to samples collected by Inspector under that Act, not to samples collected under NDPS Act, 1985.

The petitioner, M/s. Kamud Drugs Pvt. Ltd., filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking a direction to respondent No.2, the Ce...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Grievous Hurt in Targeted Attack Case. Appellant convicted under Section 326 IPC read with Section 34 IPC for causing grievous hurt with a chopper, based on consistent eyewitness testimony and medical evidence.

The appellant, Sunil alias Pona Tolaram Pore (Varma), along with three others, was prosecuted for offences under Sections 364, 307, and 326 of the Ind...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Forfeiture of Cash and Fixed Deposits in NDPS Case Despite Acquittal of Accused. Court upholds forfeiture of proceeds of narcotics trafficking under Section 8(c) read with Sections 21 and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.

The appellant, Sankapaka Laxman Bhoomaiah @ Babu, was the original accused No.1 in NDPS Special Case No. 208/1989 before the Special Judge (N.D.P.S.) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme Declaration Under Section 72 of Customs Act, 1962. Declaration Filed Beyond Scope of Scheme as It Sought to Include Disputes Not Covered by Pending Appeal.

The petitioners, Anup Engineering Limited and Shri V.R. Shah, filed a writ petition in the High Court of Judicature at Bombay challenging an order/com...