Search Results for "Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, 1966"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, 1966"

678 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 678 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Municipal Corporation's Mandamus for Land Acquisition Due to Lapsed Reservation and Financial Incapacity. Reservation under Development Plan Lapsed Under Section 127 of MRTP Act, 1966, and Acquisition Not Mandated as Corporation Lacked Funds Under RFCTLARR Act, 2013.

14 Feb 2022

The dispute involved a land reservation under the Kolhapur development plan sanctioned in 1999 for public purposes like parking and garden. The landow...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench Issues Rule in Writ Petition Challenging Nagpur Improvement Trust’s Street Widening Scheme Involving Protection of Tenants’ Interests. The Nagpur Improvement Trust Framed a Scheme Under the Nagpur Improvement Trust Act, 1936 for Systematic Development of 8.7 Acres of Land, and the Court Considered the Challenge Without Final Resolution in the Available Text.

15 Sep 2016

This writ petition was filed by multiple business entities and individuals against the State of Maharashtra, Nagpur Improvement Trust, and others conc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes State's Appellate Order Reviving Disqualification of Municipal Councillor — Appeal Not Maintainable Under Section 44(4) of Maharashtra Municipal Councils Act, 1965 as Regional Director's Order Attained Finality. The Court held that the order of the Regional Director under Section 44(4) is final and no further appeal lies to the Additional Secretary, making the impugned order a nullity.

17 Dec 2015

The Petitioner, Nagesh H. Akkalkote, challenged an order dated 29 September 2015 made by the Additional Secretary, State of Maharashtra, which purport...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Considers Writ Petition Concerning Lapsing of Land Reservation. Petitioners Claim Notice Under Section 127 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 Was Not Acted Upon by Authorities, Leading to Relief Sought.

13 Jun 2025

The petitioners filed a writ petition before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, seeking a declaration that the reservation o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Maintainability of Civil Suit Challenging MRTP Act Notice — Preliminary Issue Under Section 9A CPC Decided in Favor of Plaintiff. Court holds that bar under Section 149 of MRTP Act does not apply to notices under Section 53(1) of the Act.

4 Apr 2013

The petitioner, Prathamesh Tower Cooperative Housing Society Limited, challenged an order passed by the trial court on a preliminary issue under Secti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Against Thane Municipal Corporation's Abeyance of Buy-Back Policy - Promissory Estoppel Applied. The court held that the Corporation could not resile from its policy after the petitioners acted on it to their detriment under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

1 Nov 2023

The petitioners, Sheth Developers Pvt Ltd and Ashwin Natwarlal Sheth, acquired development rights over land from Voltas Ltd in 2003. In 2016, the Maha...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Considers Petition Challenging Stop Work Notice by Municipal Corporation and Defence Authorities. Examines if NOC from Defence is Required for Building Completion Under Town Planning and Municipal Acts.

27 Feb 2019

The petitioner, Sea Kunal Corporation Pvt. Ltd., a private limited company, undertook redevelopment of a Category A cessed building known as Rashid Ma...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Challenge to CIDCO's Demand for Premium on Additional FSI in Waluj Growth Centre; Petitioners Argue Sanctioned DCR Provides Basic FSI of 1.5 and No Premium is Chargeable, While CIDCO Contends Unauthorized Construction and Suppression of Facts

8 Jan 2019

The petitioners, three individuals engaged in business, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging communication...

High Court

High Court Examines Whether Minister Can Drop Land Acquisition After Award and Dismissal of Landowner’s Challenge. Matter Concerns Section 48 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and Power of Acquiring Authority to Object.

6 Oct 2017

The petitioner, City & Industrial Development Corporation (CIDCO), acting as the New Town's Development Authority under the Maharashtra Regional & Tow...

High Court

Bombay High Court Delivers Judgment in Public Interest Litigation No. 47 of 2013 Regarding Change of Land Use and Allotment. The court examined the validity of modifying user of a plot from public utility to commercial and the subsequent allotment to a trust.

7 Sep 2016

This Public Interest Litigation (PIL) was filed by Citizen Forum For Equality, a registered NGO, challenging the modification of user of a plot in the...

15 16 17 18 19

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)