KAHC010259352010_1
11 Jul 2014...
Search Results for "Maharashtra Development Service"
3129 result(s) found
Found 3129 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Landowners in MRTP Act Reservation Lapse Case; Reservation Deemed Lapsed as Corporation Failed to Acquire Within Six Months of Purchase Notice. Petitioners Argue That Automatic Lapsing Under Section 127 Is Irreversible and Subsequent Notification Void.
16 Sep 2022The petitioners, owners of a parcel of land bearing CTS Nos. F/189, F/190, F/191, F/192 and Final Plot No. 646, T.P.S. No. III, Bandra, Mumbai, filed ...
- 29
High Court
Bombay High Court Reserves Judgment on Writ Petition Challenging Municipal Council Land Allotment. Petitioner Seeks Quashing of Resolutions and Government Approval for Allotment of Land Reserved for Public Purposes Allegedly in Violation of Section 92 of Maharashtra Municipal Councils Act, 1965.
4 Oct 2022The writ petition, originally filed as a Public Interest Litigation, challenged the decisions of Baramati Municipal Council and the State of Maharasht...
- 31
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Batch of First Appeals in Land Acquisition Matters — No Outcome Provided. Multiple First Appeals Filed by State of Maharashtra, Maharashtra Krishna Valley Development Corporation, and Landowners Seeking Enhancement/Reduction of Compensation.
1 Jan 1970The judgment text provided only lists the title and case numbers of multiple First Appeals before the Bombay High Court, Civil Appellate Jurisdiction....
- 34
High Court
Bombay High Court Partly Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Development Agreement Dispute Between Cooperative Housing Society and Developer. Court Upholds Award on Termination of Agreement and Refund of Deposit but Sets Aside Directions for Possession and Appointment of Receiver.
7 Jan 2020The judgment arises from two arbitration petitions and a notice of motion filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challe...
- 96
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Registered Suo Motu by Police Under MRTP Act — Police Officer Lacks Authority to Register FIR Under Section 154 CrPC for Offences Under Sections 43 and 52 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966
17 Feb 2011The petitioner, Mahesh Shivram Puthran, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an FIR registered by the poli...
- 83
High Court
High Court of Bombay Declares Reservation Lapsed Under Section 127 of MRTP Act Due to Non-Acquisition Within Statutory Period. Non-acquisition of Reserved Land Within Ten Years from Development Plan Coming into Force and Further Twelve Months After Purchase Notice Triggers Automatic Lapsing Under Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.
29 Mar 2019The dispute arose from the reservation of the petitioners' land in Solapur under the Development Plan 1997-2017 for a Children's Play Ground. The Deve...
- 203
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Land Acquisition Compensation Enhancement Petitions for Agricultural Land in Nagpur — Held That Market Value Must Be Determined Under Section 23 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Based on Potential Use and Comparable Sales. The court directed reassessment of compensation considering industrial potential and comparable sales.
30 Nov -0001The judgment pertains to a batch of writ petitions filed by landowners from Takalghat, Hingna, Nagpur, challenging the compensation awarded by the Spe...
- 139
High Court
Bombay High Court Adjudicates PIL and Writ Petitions on Hoarding Permissions on Airport Land. Petitioners Allege Non-Compliance with MMC Act, 1888 Sections 328 and 328A and CRZ Regulations.
1 Mar 2018A public interest litigation and two writ petitions were filed before the Bombay High Court challenging the erection of hoardings by an advertising co...
- 33
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses PILs Challenging Ulhasnagar Development Plan, Upholds Statutory Process. Court holds that objections to draft development plan must be raised before the planning authority under MRTP Act, and belated challenges after final notification are not maintainable.
19 Dec 2023The judgment concerns two Public Interest Litigations (PILs) filed before the Bombay High Court challenging the development plan for Ulhasnagar city. ...
- 66
