Search Results for "Judicial appointments"

808 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 808 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Examines Review Petition Against Order Directing Appointment of Teacher; Emphasizes Limited Scope of Review. Management Argued Error Apparent on Record as Teacher Allegedly Not Full-Time and Post Reserved, but Court Recalls Review Not Appeal and Error Must Be Self-Evident.

The review application arose from a writ petition filed by a teacher seeking regularization as Lecturer in English. The High Court had earlier allowed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions of 339 Temporary Employees Seeking Regularisation. Appointments made without following recruitment rules do not confer right to permanency.

This batch of writ petitions was filed by 339 petitioners challenging a common judgment and order of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Mumbai Bench...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to Reservation in Promotion Policy of Mumbai Port Trust; Office Memorandum Dated 21 January 2002 Under Scrutiny. Petitioners Allege Violation of M. Nagaraj Principles and 100% Reservation for SC/ST in Office Superintendent Cadre.

The writ petition was filed by the Mumbai Port Trust Non SC/ST Employees Association, an association registered under the Trade Unions Act representin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Reduction of Term of District Government Pleader and Public Prosecutor. Amendment reducing term from three years to one year held valid; no vested right to continue for full term.

The petitioner, Vikas Baburao Patil Shirgaonkar, was appointed as District Government Pleader and Public Prosecutor at Satara on 6th August 2014 for a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Suit Seeking Removal of Managing Director on Ground of Age Limit Under Companies Act, 2013. Section 196(3)(a) of Companies Act, 2013 Held Not Retrospective and Does Not Automatically Terminate Existing Appointments.

The plaintiff, a director of Ultramarine & Pigments Limited, filed a suit seeking an order to restrain the 2nd defendant, the Chairman and Managing Di...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition by Court Officers Seeking Parity in Pension and Retirement Benefits with Higher Judicial Officers. Classification of employees into Class I and Class II based on duties and responsibilities is valid and not discriminatory under Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution.

The petitioners, fifteen officers of the High Court of Bombay holding positions such as Registrar, Prothonotary, Commissioner for Taking Accounts, Add...