Search Results for "Customs tariff"

312 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 312 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court of India Decides Revenue Appeal Against Tribunal's Order on Excise Valuation of Fiat Cars. Assessee's Price Below Cost Held as Normal Price Under Section 4(1)(a) by Tribunal, Revenue Challenges on Ground That Price Did Not Reflect Manufacturing Cost and Profit.

The dispute concerned the valuation of Fiat Uno model cars for central excise duty under Section 4 of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The assessee, M/s ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Classification of Plant Growth Promoters as Excisable Goods Under Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. Products Containing NPK as Essential Constituent Classified as 'Other Fertilizers' Under Note 6 Chapter 3105, Attracting 1% Duty.

The petitioners, Dharti Agro Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. and its director, challenged an order dated 8 March 2017 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Answers Reference Against Assessee in Cenvat Credit Reversal Case for Exempted Goods. Supreme Court Precedent Requires Reversal Even When No Sale Involved Under Rule 57CC of Central Excise Rules, 1944.

The Commissioner of Central Excise, Salem filed a reference case under Section 35H(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, seeking an answer to a question...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Disposes of Writ Petition on Octroi Duty Classification of Rubber Goods. Court Directs Development Commissioner's Opinion on Commercial Identity and Trade Usage of Imported Items Under Maharashtra Municipality Octroi Rules.

The writ petition was filed by Ceat Tyres of India Ltd., a tyre manufacturer, challenging octroi duty demand notices issued by the Nashik Municipal Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Disabled Petitioner to Import Car Without Customs Clearance Permit Under Central Government Policy for Physically Handicapped Persons. The court permitted clearance of the modified car under the exemption order, holding that the policy did not require a Customs Clearance Permit.

The petitioner, Kirti M. Kothari, a disabled person suffering from Polio affecting his left arm, imported a car with appropriate modifications under a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal in Central Excise Clandestine Removal Case — CESTAT Order Upheld for Lack of Evidence. Allegation of removal of 1,687,585.511 kg of yarn without duty payment fails as Revenue could not prove clandestine removal beyond reasonable doubt.

The Principal Commissioner of Central GST & C. Ex., Daman Commissionerate, filed an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, against ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging MODVAT Credit Denial Under Rule 57C of Central Excise Rules, 1944. Inputs Used in Manufacture of Exempted Final Products Not Eligible for Credit.

The petitioners, Atlas Automotive Components Private Limited and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before ...