Search Results for "Commercial Division jurisdiction"

2993 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2993 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Condonation of Delay in Filing Written Statement in Commercial IP Suit — Delay of 410 Days Not Sufficiently Explained. Policy Changes and Preoccupation of Legal Team Held Not to Constitute Sufficient Cause Under Order VIII Rule 1 CPC.

The case involves a commercial IP suit filed by Metro Shoes Ltd (Plaintiff) against Flipkart India Pvt. Ltd. and Tech-Connect Retail Pvt. Ltd. (Defend...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case on Unexplained Investment in Silver Bullion. Section 69A of Income Tax Act, 1961 Applicable Where Assessee Fails to Explain Source of Acquisition of Silver Found in Possession.

The present appeals were filed by the Revenue against the judgment of the Rajasthan High Court which allowed the appeals of the assessee, Prakash Chan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses/Allows Appeals Against Interim Orders Restraining LCIA Arbitration in Convertible Debentures Dispute. Court Examines Whether Civil Suit to Restrain Arbitration is Maintainable Under Section 5 of Arbitration Act and Interprets Arbitration Clause.

The litigation arises from a dispute over a Compulsorily Convertible Debentures Subscription and Securities Holders Agreement dated 21.06.2013 between...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Land Acquisition Case Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Notifications invoking urgency under Section 17(4) and dispensing with inquiry under Section 5A upheld as land was necessary for residential colony scheme and decision based on subjective satisfaction of authority.

The dispute arose from land acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, initiated by the State of Uttar Pradesh and the Bulandshhar ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Recall of Witness and Additional Documents in Commercial Suit — Upholds Liberal Approach Under Order XVIII Rule 17 CPC. Party Seeking to Place on Record E-Mails and Recall PW-1 for Cross-Examination Must Be Permitted to Ensure Fair Trial and Effective Adjudication.

The dispute arose from a Professional Services Agreement dated 19th February 2013 between M/s. Levitate Mobile Technologies Pvt. Ltd. (LMT), the appel...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 350 OF 2017

The case concerns two petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award dated 14 February ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Society's Section 9 Petition for Possession and Injunction Against Developer in Redevelopment Dispute. Court Holds That Disputed Questions of Title and Possession Cannot Be Decided in Summary Proceedings Under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The judgment concerns two competing petitions under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Rajawadi Arunodaya Co-operative ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act Against Single Judge Order Dismissing Section 34 Petition Due to Foreign Seat and Governing Law — Interpretation of Escrow Agreement Clauses

The appeal arose from a Commercial Appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Katra Holdings Ltd., a Mauritius co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State's Commercial Appeal, Upholds Arbitral Award in ICT Project Dispute — Termination Found Unlawful. Composite Contract and Direct Nexus Between State and Consortium Rendered Claim Maintainable, and Arbitral Award of Rs.178.98 Crores Not Against Public Policy.

The appeal arises from an arbitral award of Rs.178,98,38,525 in favour of respondent No.1, a consortium partner, against the State of Karnataka for wr...