Search Results for "Bombay Housing and Area Development Board"

448 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 448 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Applications Against Rejection of Order 7 Rule 11 CPC Plea in Suit for Recovery and Declaration. Plaint Discloses Cause of Action and is Not Barred by Limitation or Res Judicata Under Order 7 Rule 11 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

The judgment arises from two Civil Revision Applications filed against orders passed by the trial court rejecting applications under Order 7 Rule 11 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging MCZMA's Refusal of CRZ Clearance for Occupancy Certificate. MCZMA cannot refuse clearance on ground of mismatch between DCR 1991 and DCR 1967 when construction was lawfully permitted under DCR 1991.

The petitioner, MRK Enterprises, a partnership firm, owned a property known as 'Amir House' at Colaba, Mumbai. The petitioner sought a Coastal Zone Re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Exemption Case. Assessee Held Eligible for Exemption Under Section 10(20A) as Development Authority and Business Commenced in Relevant Year.

The appeal was filed by the Revenue under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, challenging the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Additional Development Charges Demand by Nagpur Improvement Trust on Transferee of Regularized Plot. NIT Lacks Competency to Impose Additional Charges After Regularization Under Maharashtra Gunthewari Act, 2001.

The petitioner, Pramod Ganpatrao Pinge, challenged a demand notice issued by the Nagpur Improvement Trust (NIT) calling upon him to pay additional reg...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — No Enhancement of Compensation for Acquired Land. Appellants failed to prove entitlement to enhanced market value of Rs.2500 per sq. metre under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The appellants, owners of land acquired for road construction in Margao, Goa, challenged the compensation awarded by the Land Acquisition Officer at R...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Municipal Corporation's Challenge to Minister's Order Directing Grant of TDR in Lieu of Reservation. Landowners Entitled to Transferable Development Rights Under MRTP Act After Finalization of Town Planning Scheme.

The judgment involves two writ petitions: one by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (Corporation) challenging the order of the Minister for U...