Search Results for "Civil Jurisdiction"

22576 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 22576 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Allows Correction of Clerical Error in MACT Judgment — Mistake in Identifying Driver as Owner of Vehicle. Section 166 Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Tribunal's refusal to correct error set aside; liability shifted to insurance company.

The petitioners, original respondent Nos. 1 and 2 in a Motor Accident Claim Petition, challenged an order of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petition for Lack of Jurisdiction in Cotton Contract Dispute. Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause in Favor of Indore Courts Prevails Over Arbitral Seat at Mumbai.

The petitioner, M/s. Nomula Brothers, filed an Arbitration Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arb...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Amendment to Section 26 of Bombay Civil Courts Act Prospective, Not Applicable to Pending Appeals. Amendment increasing pecuniary jurisdiction of District Court from Rs.1 lakh to Rs.5 lakh does not apply to appeals already filed before the amendment came into force.

The Bombay High Court considered a reference arising from a learned Single Judge's order dated 4 March 2011, which formulated two questions regarding ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Show Cause Notices in Tenancy Case Due to 33-Year Delay and Land Conversion -- Proceedings Under Bombay Tenancy Act Barred When Land Converted to Non-Agricultural Use

The petitioners challenged show cause notices issued under Section 84C of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land Act, 1948 regarding land transactio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Against MSRTC Contract Termination Due to Breach of Contractual Obligations. Court Holds That Article 226 Jurisdiction Cannot Be Ousted by Agreement, But Petitioner Failed to Show Arbitrariness or Unreasonableness in Termination.

The petitioner, M/s S.K. Translines Pvt. Ltd., was awarded a work order by Respondent No. 5 (General Manager (Traffic), MSRTC) for carrying out the bu...