Search Results for "arbitrary date"

5716 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5716 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Promotion Rule of Forest Development Corporation Requiring Departmental Exam, Dismisses RFO's Petition. Rule 3(1) Providing Different Deadlines for Existing and Future Officers Held Non-Discriminatory as Multiple Opportunities Given and Seniority Not Sole Basis.

The dispute arose when a Range Forest Officer employed with the Forest Development Corporation of Maharashtra Ltd. (F.D.C.M.) challenged his supersess...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Autonomy of Engineering College and State's Power to Nullify Appointments. Multiple Writ Petitions Challenge Order Terminating 54 Lecturers at College of Engineering, Pune under TEQIP Autonomy.

The case involved three writ petitions before the Bombay High Court concerning the autonomy of the College of Engineering, Pune (CoEP) and the State G...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court considers legality of State interference in recruitment by an autonomous technical institute. The dispute centers on the scope of autonomy under Government Resolutions and the power of the Board of Governors to make appointments without State oversight.

The College of Engineering, Pune (CoEP), established in 1854, is a premier technical institute. In 2002, under the Technical Education Quality Improve...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partly Allows Contempt Appeal: Editor's Conviction Upheld, Politician's Quashed for Pre-Arrest Statement on Murder Conspiracy. Majority holds pre-arrest statement not contempt as proceedings not imminent; editor liable as publication post-arrest.

The dispute arose from a contempt proceeding against A.K. Gopalan, a political leader, and P. Govinda Pillai, editor of the newspaper 'Deshabhimani', ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Appeal Against Company Law Board Order Dismissing Petition. Court Frames Questions on Applicability of Section 111A and Section 43A of Companies Act, 1956 to Deemed Public Company.

The appeal arose from a company petition filed by the appellants, members of the Kavasmaneck family, before the Company Law Board, Mumbai, alleging op...