Search Results for "Civil Jurisdiction"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Civil Jurisdiction"

22576 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 22576 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Writ Petition Concerning Cooperative Society Election Dispute; Specific Holding Not Mentioned in Extracted Text. Petitioner Challenged Actions of Cooperative Election Authorities in Relation to Taklibhan Vividh Karyakari Seva Sahakari Sanstha Ltd.

1 Jan 1970

The extracted text from the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, consists only of the cause title, case number, party array, and citation for Writ Pet...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment in Revision Petition Under MRTU & PULP Act — Industrial Court Has Power to Permit Amendment. The Court held that the Industrial Court exercising revisional jurisdiction under Section 44 of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions & Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 has the power to permit amendment of the memo of revision petition, as the power to allow amendment is inherent in the exercise of revisional jurisdiction.

5 May 2022

The petitioners, Rashtrasant Tukdoji Maharaj Technical and Educational Society and another, challenged an order dated 16/09/2019 passed by the Industr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Letters Patent Appeal as Not Maintainable Against Single Judge Order in Landlord-Tenant Dispute. Appeal Under Clause 15 of Letters Patent Not Maintainable Where Single Judge Exercises Supervisory Jurisdiction Under Article 227 Over Civil Court Orders.

1 Oct 2010

The case arose from a landlord-tenant dispute. The respondents (landlords) had filed a civil suit for eviction of the appellant (tenant). The trial co...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Arbitration Matter Due to Lack of Jurisdiction Under Section 5 of Arbitration Act. Review Petition Against Order Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Held Not Maintainable as Review Not Provided Under Part I of the Act.

23 Jan 2013

The petitioner, M/s Madhav Structural Engineering Ltd., was awarded a contract by the respondent, Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation Ltd.,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Land Acquisition Dispute for Lack of Jurisdiction. Civil Court lacks jurisdiction to entertain suit challenging acquisition under Land Acquisition Act, 1894, as remedy lies before Reference Court under Section 18.

10 Oct 2013

The appellants, owners of a property in Agonda, Goa, filed a suit seeking withdrawal from acquisition of their plots and compensation of Rs. 1,20,00,0...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Industrial Dispute Reference Due to Procedural Irregularity in Conciliation Initiation Under Industrial Disputes Act

27 Jan 2026

The Supreme Court allowed the civil appeal filed by Appellants challenging the reference of industrial dispute to Industrial Court, Aurangabad -- The ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Takes Suo Moto Cognizance of COVID-19 Public Health Infrastructure in Maharashtra. Court Refers to Earlier Principal Seat Judgment Highlighting State's Obligation Under Epidemic Diseases Act, 1897 and Disaster Management Act, 2005.

18 Aug 2020

On 26.06.2020, the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, registered Suo Moto Criminal Public Interest Litigation No.1 of 2020 to ad...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Preferential Right of Heir Under Section 22 of Hindu Succession Act in Agricultural Land Dispute. Section 22 Applies to Agricultural Land as Succession is a Concurrent Subject and Section 4(2) Omission Confirms Uniform Application.

15 Feb 2019

The appeal arose from a dispute between two brothers, Santokh Singh and Nathu Ram, who inherited agricultural land from their father. An arrangement f...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Allows Civil Revision Application, Rejects Plaint as Barred by Limitation and Without Cause of Action in Suit Challenging Sale Deed After Nine Years. The court held that a suit filed nine years after the execution of a sale deed is ex facie barred by limitation under Article 58 of the Limitation Act, 1963, and the plaint must be rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC.

12 Jan 2026

The present Civil Revision Application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, was filed by the applicant, Casme Industrial Park Devel...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashed FIR and Charge-Sheet Against Hospital Directors — Purely Civil Dispute With No Criminality Involved Tagline: No Ingredients of Cheating Established — Criminal Proceedings Termed an Abuse of Law Headnote: Acts and Sections Discussed: Constitution of India (COI) — Article 226 (Writ Jurisdiction) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 482 (Inherent Powers of High Court) Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 418 (Cheating With Knowledge), Section 420 (Cheating and Dishonest Inducement), Section 34 (Acts Done by Several Persons in Furtherance of Common Intention) Keywords:Writ Jurisdiction — Quashing of FIR — Commercial Transaction — Civil Suit — Non-Payment of Dues — Abuse of Process — No Criminal Offence Nature of the Litigation:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking quashing of FIR and charge-sheet. Petitioners’ Relief Sought:Quashing of FIR No.98 of 2020 lodged at Bhosari Police Station and the charge-sheet arising from it. Reason for Filing the Case:Allegations of non-payment of professional dues and financial aid advanced to the hospital. Prior Decisions:Special Civil Suit No.1161 of 2018 filed by the complainant for recovery of Rs.53,11,652/- was pending before the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Pune. Issues:Whether the dispute between the parties was of a civil or criminal nature, and whether criminal proceedings were maintainable alongside a pending civil suit. Submissions/Arguments:(a) Petitioners: FIR related to events preceding their control of the hospital — No criminal intention or inducement established — Civil suit already instituted for the same financial claims. (b) Respondents: Civil and criminal proceedings can proceed simultaneously — Alleged WhatsApp messages demonstrated promises to clear dues. Decision:FIR and charge-sheet quashed — Court held that the case was purely civil in nature, with no elements of cheating or criminality — Proceedings deemed an abuse of process of law. Ratio:No criminal offence was made out against the petitioners — Allegations of non-payment related to a period before the petitioners took control of the hospital — Civil remedy already sought by the complainant — No dishonest inducement proven as required under Sections 415 and 420 of IPC. Relevant Paragraphs:Paras 9, 10, and 11 of the judgment outline the court’s rationale for quashing the FIR and charge-sheet.

4 Feb 2025

FIR and charge-sheet quashed — Court held that the case was purely civil in nature, with no elements of cheating or criminality — Proceedings deem...

162 163 164 165 166

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)