Search Results for "invalid application"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "invalid application"

3983 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3983 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Hears Challenge to Royalty Rules Under MMDR Act. Petitioners Argue Notification and Amended Rule 64D Exceed Section 9(3) Powers.

8 May 2013

These writ petitions arose out of challenges by various mining leaseholders in Goa to the notification dated 13 August 2009, the amendment to Rule 64D...

High Court

NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 443 OF 2012

27 Jun 2013

The matter arises out of Suit No. 1512 of 2009 before the Bombay High Court, filed by Shapoorji Pallonji & Company Ltd. against Jignesh Shah, Aruna Sh...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Supersession of APMC as Previous Consultation with State Agricultural Marketing Board Not Validly Conducted. The requirement of 'previous consultation' under Section 45(1) of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963 was not satisfied as the consultation was held only with the Board's office bearers instead of the full Board.

9 Apr 2013

Fifteen directors of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Amravati, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of Indi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Whether Endorsement on RT-12 Return Constitutes Notice of Demand Under Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, 1998. The Court examines the rejection of a declaration under the KVS Scheme on the ground of absence of a show cause notice, where the RT-12 return contained a specific demand endorsement.

29 Jun 2005

The petitioner, a manufacturer of processed fabrics, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the rejection of its declaration u...

High Court

Bombay High Court Addresses Interim Applications in Redevelopment Contract Dispute Between Developer and Partner. The Court Examines Injunctions Against Termination and Alienation of Property Under the Specific Relief Act.

27 Jun 2013

The plaintiff, Shapoorji Pallonji & Company Ltd., a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1913, filed Suit No. 1512 of 2009 before the Bombay ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Landlords in Eviction Suit for Lease Termination — Unregistered Option Letters Do Not Extend Lease Term Under Section 107 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. Omission of the Word 'Structure' in Termination Notice Does Not Invalidate Termination of Lease Covering Land with Structure as Composite Premises.

1 Aug 2011

The dispute involved a piece of land admeasuring 1310 sq. yards with structure in Worli, Mumbai, leased by three original lessors to Caltex (India) Lt...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Hears Writ Petition Challenging Electricity Demand Notice and Rebate Calculation. Dispute Concerns Application of 25% Tariff Rebate Under Indian Electricity Act, 1910 Pursuant to 1999 Judgment

8 Jul 2011

The matter concerns a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by a sick industrial unit engaged in steel manufacturing. The...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Appeal Against Refusal to Reject Plaint Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC; Holds Suit Not Barred by Section 34 of SARFAESI Act. Plaintiffs, Claiming Independent Rights as Co-owners and Not Being Parties to Loan/Mortgage Transaction, Could Not Be Barred Under Section 34 as Their Suit Challenges Mortgage Validity Only Against Their Share, Not the Securitization Process Itself.

8 Dec 2010

The dispute arose from a loan transaction between State Bank of India (appellant/first defendant) and Crosslink Shipbreakers (P) Ltd. (principal borro...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Consumer Protection (Qualification for Appointment, method of recruitment, procedure for appointment, term of office, resignation and removal of the President and members of the State Commission and District Commission) Rules, 2020 — Petitioners Seek Quashing of Rule 6(1) and Rule 10(2). Rule 6(1) Selection Committee Composition with Two Executive Members Alongside High Court Judge Challenged as Violative of Doctrine of Separation of Powers and Rule 10(2) Restricting Tenure to Four Years Challenged as Denying Reappointment Eligibility.

20 Oct 2023

These were three writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court challenging Rule...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to Consumer Protection Rules 2020 on Selection Committee Composition and Tenure. Petitioners challenge Rule 6(1) and Rule 10(2) of the Consumer Protection Rules, 2020 as violative of separation of powers and arbitrary, seeking declaration of eligibility for re-appointment.

20 Oct 2023

The Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, heard three writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging Rule 6(1) and Rule 10...

161 162 163 164 165

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)