Search Results for "Explanation sale"

3311 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3311 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Stamp Duty Reassessment Order for Lack of Proper Notice and Violation of Natural Justice. Petitioner's Property Valuation Dispute Remanded for Fresh Adjudication After Finding That Show-Cause Notice Was Not Served and Opportunity of Hearing Was Denied.

The petitioner, Armstrong Machine Builders Private Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay Hig...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging SAFEMA Notice Against Family Members of Convicted NDPS Offender. Property Attachment Under SAFEMA Sections 68A-68I Upheld as Independent of Criminal Trial Outcome.

The petitioners, Zaibunissa Ebrahim Khan, Junaid Ebrahim Khan, Faizal Ebrahim Khan, Imran Ebrahim Khan, and Afzal Ebrahim Khan, are family members of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Co-operative Housing Society Dispute Over Title to Property — Decree of Specific Performance Set Aside Due to Non-Compliance with Statutory Requirements Under Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 and Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963.

The appellant, The Pashmina Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., filed an appeal under Section 96 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908, challenging the jud...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Share Dispute — No Grounds for Interference Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court Held That the Arbitral Tribunal's Findings on Non-Delivery of Shares and Limitation Were Not Perverse or Contrary to Law.

The appellant, M/s Satish K. Narang & Co., an investor, filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, against the ju...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening of Ceiling Proceedings After 15 Years Due to Inordinate Delay. Suo Moto Revision Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 Held Invalid for Lack of Reasonable Time and Violation of Natural Justice.

The petitioner, Dyanoba S/o Bapurao Shendge, filed a writ petition challenging the judgment and order dated 20th April 1992 passed by the Additional C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Eviction Case — No Error Apparent on Record. Review of judgment dated 21.10.2010 in Writ Petition No.711/2010 rejected as applicants sought re-argument of merits, not review under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC.

The applicants, tenants Shrichand s/o Rochaldas Khemani and Kawarlal s/o Rochaldas Khemani, filed a review application before the Bombay High Court, N...