Search Results for "corresponding provision"

2265 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2265 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Information Commission Order in RTI Case — Petitioner Not a Third Party Under Section 11 of RTI Act. Personal Information of Public Servant Sought Cannot Be Denied Under Section 8(1)(j) Without Showing Larger Public Interest.

The petitioner, Smt. S. Savithramma, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Partner in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Sanction Under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Proceedings Initiated Without Valid Sanction for Prosecution of a Public Servant Are Void Ab Initio.

The petitioner, K. Janardhana Reddy, a partner of M/s S.B. Logistics, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seek...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Insurance Company's Petition for Production of Disability Certificate in Motor Accident Claim. Tribunal's Rejection of Application Under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 2019 Set Aside for Denying Fair Opportunity to Cross-Examine Claimant.

The petitioner, TATA AIG General Insurance Co. Ltd., filed a Special Civil Application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India and Sec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Revision Against Order Allowing Production of Original Documents in Summary Suit. Order XXXVII Rule 7 CPC permits application of general CPC provisions for filing originals of photocopies already on record.

The respondent/plaintiff filed a summary suit for recovery of money under Order XXXVII CPC. Along with the plaint, he filed 22 documents, of which 7 w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Appellate Court Cannot Routinely Enhance Compensation Without Claimant's Appeal or Cross-Objections in Motor Accident Claims. Enhancement Permissible Only in Manifestly Unjust Awards Under Section 168 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a First Appeal under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, filed by United India Insurance Co Ltd against an award of the Motor Accident ...