Search Results for "storage violation"

425 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 425 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging MPCB Closure Order for Violation of Environmental Norms. Petitioner's failure to obtain valid consent to operate under Water and Air Acts justifies closure for operating without environmental clearance.

The petitioner, Green Gene Enviro Protection and Infrastructure Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Upholds Arbitral Award in Favor of Oil Corporation in Kerosene Supply Contract Dispute. Arbitrator Had Rejected Limitation Defense Under Contractual Clause and Held Clause Not Void Under Section 28 of Indian Contract Act.

The matter arose from an arbitration petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by the original respondent in the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 2317 OF 2019

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Criminal Applications to Quash Process in Food Adulteration Prosecution. Vicarious Liability of Company Directors Under Prevention of Food and Adulteration Act Examined in Light of Nomination Under Rule 12-B and Factory-Specific Nature of Such Nomination.

The dispute arose from two criminal applications under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 filed by Bharat Puri and others, including ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Maharashtra Entry Tax on Goods. Petitioners Argue That Differential Tax Burden on Imported LNG and Air Conditioners Violates Constitutional Provisions, Relying on Jindal Stainless Steel Principle.

Three writ petitions were heard together by the Bombay High Court, all challenging the constitutional validity of the Maharashtra Tax on the Entry of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes MMDR Act Proceedings Initiated by Police in Multiple Petitions; Police Not Authorized Under Section 22 of MMDR Act. Cognizance of Offences Under Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 Cannot Be Taken on Police Report—Only Authorized Persons Can File Complaint.

The High Court of Karnataka at Dharwad Bench heard a batch of twelve criminal petitions filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 197...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Petitioners in Food Adulteration Case — No Offence Made Out Under Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006. Sale of 'Mint' and 'Saunf' Products Not Prohibited Under Section 26(2)(i) of FSS Act, 2006 as They Are Not 'Food' as Defined.

The petitioners, Anand Ramdhani Chaurasia and Vijay Banarasi Chaurasia, were engaged in the business of selling 'Mint' and 'Saunf' products. On 12th J...