Search Results for "setting aside exparte decree"

203 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 203 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Suit for Possession and Mesne Profits — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Letters Patent Appeal against decree for possession and mesne profits dismissed as no substantial question of law or perversity found in concurrent findings of fact.

The present Letters Patent Appeal arises from a judgment and decree passed by a Single Judge of the Bombay High Court in First Appeal No. 133/1976, wh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Appeal Under Section 14 of Admiralty Act Against Single Judge Order Dismissing Defendant's Notice of Motion. The dispute concerned breach of a bareboat charterparty and a subsequent time charterparty regarding a vessel.

The original plaintiff, Siem Offshore Rederi AS, a Norwegian company, filed Admiralty Suit (L) No. 20 of 2018 before the Bombay High Court against the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Injunction Suit — Condonation of Delay Principles Reiterated. First Appellate Court erred in rejecting delay condonation application by applying strict limitation principles instead of liberal approach under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The case involves a second appeal arising from a property dispute. The plaintiff, Vinay Madhukar Kulkarni, filed Regular Civil Suit No.155 of 2007 for...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Court Held That No Substantial Question of Law Arises When Both Lower Courts Concurrently Found That Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Title and Possession.

The appellants (plaintiffs) filed a suit for declaration of title and permanent injunction in respect of certain immovable property. The trial court d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Second Appeal in Property Suit — Reverses First Appellate Court's Decision and Restores Trial Court's Decree. Court Holds That the First Appellate Court Failed to Properly Reappreciate Evidence and Erred in Reversing the Well-Reasoned Judgment of the Trial Court.

The present regular second appeal was filed by the plaintiffs, Parvathamma and Lokesh H., challenging the judgment and decree dated 10.11.2004 passed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Injunction Suit — Condonation of Delay Principles Reiterated. First Appellate Court erred in rejecting application for condonation of delay by applying strict standards instead of liberal approach under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The case involves a property dispute between family members. The plaintiff, Vinay Madhukar Kulkarni, filed a suit for perpetual injunction against the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition in Property Dispute Due to Abatement. Failure to Bring Legal Representatives on Record Leads to Abatement Under Order 22 CPC.

The case pertains to a writ petition filed in the High Court of Bombay at Goa concerning a property dispute among family members. The petitioners, inc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Unsigned Award Declared Invalid. An award under Section 11 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 must be signed by the officer; death of officer before signing renders award a nullity and land does not vest under Section 16.

The case involves a second appeal by the original plaintiffs (appellants) against the judgment of the District Court, Thane, which reversed the trial ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appellant's Second Appeals in Property Dispute Cases Due to Lack of Substantial Question of Law. Concurrent findings of fact by lower courts on encroachment and possession were upheld as not perverse under Section 100 of CPC, 1908.

The judgment pertains to two second appeals filed by the same appellant, Pandurang Dharma Gaikwad, against the respondent, Mahamudmuya Ahmadsaheb Pati...