Search Results for "section 77(1)"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "section 77(1)"

193 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 193 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Retiral Benefits to Retired Employee Despite Invalidated Tribe Claim — Pensionary Benefits Cannot Be Withheld for Invalid Caste Claim After Superannuation. The court held that the right to pension is a right earned by past service and cannot be forfeited after retirement under Rule 27 of the Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982.

1 Jul 2026

The petitioner, Ramesh s/o Mahadeorao Ukande, was appointed as an Observer in the India Meteorological Department on 19.11.1986 against a post reserve...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Collector's Order in Stamp Duty Dispute — Auction Sale Consideration Prevails Over Market Value. Stamp duty on sale certificate must be computed on actual auction sale consideration, not market value, under Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958.

28 Jan 2026

The petitioner, Shweta Aditya Malhotra, purchased a property through an auction sale conducted by the Collector of Stamps, Andheri Division, Mumbai, f...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes ICC Report in POSH Act Case for Violation of Natural Justice — Petitioner Not Given Opportunity to Cross-Examine Complainant. Internal Complaints Committee's finding of sexual harassment set aside as inquiry conducted without adhering to principles of natural justice under Section 11 of the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013.

3 Nov 2025

The petitioner, an employee of Akasa Air, was accused of sexual harassment by a female colleague (Respondent No. 3). An Internal Complaints Committee ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under PITNDPS Act for Non-Communication of Grounds in Language Known to Detenu. Failure to Serve Grounds in English to South African National Who Does Not Know English Violates Article 22(5) of Constitution and Section 8 of PITNDPS Act.

15 Sep 2022

The petitioner, Agisilaos Demetriades, a South African national, challenged an order of detention dated 21.09.2021 passed by Respondent No.2, the Join...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Transfer Petition in Criminal Trademark Case Due to Insufficient Grounds and Substantial Progress in Trial. Overlapping Issues with Civil Suits and Convenience Arguments Fail to Justify Transfer Under Section 406 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, as Criminal Proceeding Would Remain Before Magistrate, Not High Court.

7 May 2021

The dispute originated from a criminal complaint filed by Sabu Trade Private Limited against Rajkumar Sabu under Section 156(3) of the Code of Crimina...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Second Appeal in Permanent Injunction Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Suit for Injunction Simpliciter Dismissed as Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Possession Over Disputed Strip of Land.

20 Dec 2018

The appellants (original plaintiffs) filed a suit for permanent injunction simpliciter against the respondents (original defendants) claiming that the...

High Court

High Court Partially Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Under Section 163A of Motor Vehicles Act — Reduces Future Prospects and Non-Pecuniary Damages. The structured formula under the Second Schedule does not permit future prospects or excessive non-pecuniary damages.

10 Mar 2016

The case arises from a motor accident claim petition filed under Section 163A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, by the legal representatives of the dec...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Levy on Petitioner for Mathadi Workers' Wages After Godown Closure — Employer Not Liable for Wages When No Work Available Due to Closure of Premises. The Court held that under Section 18 of the Maharashtra Mathadi, Hamal and Other Manual Workers (Regulation of Employment and Welfare) Act, 1969, an employer is not liable to pay wages when no work is available due to closure of the establishment.

12 Jan 2010

The petitioner, West Coast Paper Mills Ltd., is a paper manufacturer with a factory in Dandeli, Karnataka. It had a rented godown at Reay Road, Mumbai...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Chief Settlement Commissioner's Order Cancelling Allotment of Land Due to Absence of Finding of Fraud. Mandatory Condition under Section 24(2) of Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act, 1954 Not Satisfied.

22 Sep 1969

The Supreme Court allowed an appeal by Estates Development Ltd. against the Union of India and others, concerning the cancellation of an allotment of ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal and Holds Incentive Payments Not Automatically Wages Under Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948. Inam Scheme Payments Not Considered Remuneration Under Contract of Employment as Employer Reserved Right to Withdraw Scheme.

6 Oct 1967

The dispute arose under the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948, concerning whether incentive payments known as 'inam' paid to workers under a scheme...

14 15 16 17 18

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)