Search Results for "public gambling"

165 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 165 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Inconsistent Witness Testimony. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Bhatu S/o Himmat Akhade, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Dhule, for the murder of his wife Sangita and for attempting t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes CBFC Cuts Imposed on Film on Drug Addiction; Holds Pre-Censorship Must Conform to Article 19(2) Reasonable Restrictions. State's Decision to Delete References to Punjab and Mutilate Content Violates Freedom of Speech Under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution.

The first petitioner, a film production company, sought a writ of certiorari to quash the decision of the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Violation of Article 22(5) and Non-Application of Mind. Detenu's Right to Make Representation Not Communicated, Rendering Detention Illegal.

The petitioner, Rohit Uddhav Kadlaskar, challenged a preventive detention order dated 10.11.2025 passed by the District Magistrate, Solapur under the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Section 11(6) Application and Appoints Sole Arbitrator in Property Sale Dispute. Arbitration clauses in MOU and Agreement for Sale held prima facie valid, and dispute referred to arbitration despite respondent's objection regarding non-signing of agreement.

The applicant, Bhupinder Singh Balwant Singh, filed an application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointm...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Communication of Grounds. Failure to Supply Copies of Documents Relied Upon Violates Article 22(5) of Constitution and Section 8 of MPDA Act.

The petitioner, Rohit Uddhav Kadlaskar, challenged a detention order dated 10.11.2025 passed by the District Magistrate, Solapur under the Maharashtra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order in MPDA Act Case Due to Non-Supply of Legible Documents. Failure to Provide Legible Copies of Statements and In-Camera Statements Violates Detenu's Right to Effective Representation Under Article 22(5) of Constitution of India.

The petitioner, Avhdut Narayn Shendge, filed a writ petition challenging an order of preventive detention dated 29th January 2026 passed by the Distri...