KAHC010059832012_1
21 Jun 2016The available text of the judgment only includes the list of parties in W.P.No.27674/2012 and connected cases, filed as a Public Interest Litigation b...
Search Results for "policy exclusion"
1079 result(s) found
Found 1079 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Compassionate Appointment to Brother of Deceased Teacher Despite Policy Restricting to Widow/Children. Policy of Government Resolutions dated 31st December 2002 and 21st September 2017 held directory, not mandatory, and appointment of brother as Junior Clerk upheld.
23 Dec 2022The petitioner, Vinod Budhbaware, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Wardha, dated 20th...
- 166
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Levy of Fees on Transporters and Traders Under Essential Commodities Act for Maintenance of Public Distribution System. The court held that the levy under Section 3(3)(f) of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 is a valid regulatory fee and not a tax.
13 Dec 2013The judgment involves multiple writ petitions and civil applications challenging the levy of fees on transporters and traders under the Maharashtra Es...
- 125
High Court
- 65
High Court
Full Bench of Bombay High Court Clarifies Maintainability of Civil Suits and Jurisdiction of School Tribunal under Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977. Reference Addresses Implied Bar on Civil Court Jurisdiction Over Matters Appealable to Tribunal and Related Questions on Approval of Appointments.
18 Dec 2006The reference to the Full Bench of the Bombay High Court arose from Second Appeal No. 533 of 2001 concerning an employment dispute between a private s...
- 37
High Court
Division Bench of Karnataka High Court Hears Challenge to Karnataka Hindu Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments (Amendment) Act, 2011 by Temple Trusts. Petitioners Allege Amendment Is Discriminatory and Violative of Fundamental Rights Under Constitution.
17 Nov 2015The petitioners, comprising 64 Hindu religious institutions and charitable trusts from various districts of Karnataka, filed writ petitions under Arti...
- 87
High Court
- 75
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Metro Fare Hike; Judicial Review Not Permitted Over Specialist Committee's Decision Under Metro Act. Fare Fixation Committee's Determination Based on Section 34 Prevails Over Contractual Fare Stipulations, Limited to Checking Arbitrariness or Perversity.
4 Dec 2017The writ petition challenged the Fare Fixation Committee's decision to increase Mumbai Metro fares from Rs.9-13 to Rs.10-110 from January 2015. The pe...
- 68
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Against Dismissal of Section 34 Application as Time-Barred. Limitation for Filing Application Under Section 34(3) Runs from Receipt of Award; Suit Filed Within Extended 30-Day Period Without Showing Sufficient Cause for Delay Cannot be Entertained.
26 Nov 2019This appeal arose from the dismissal of an arbitration suit filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbit...
- 76
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State's Commercial Appeal, Upholds Arbitral Award in ICT Project Dispute — Termination Found Unlawful. Composite Contract and Direct Nexus Between State and Consortium Rendered Claim Maintainable, and Arbitral Award of Rs.178.98 Crores Not Against Public Policy.
18 Sep 2025The appeal arises from an arbitral award of Rs.178,98,38,525 in favour of respondent No.1, a consortium partner, against the State of Karnataka for wr...
- 30
