High Court of Karnataka Hears Multiple Writ Petitions Challenging Labour Court Awards. Petitions Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution Seeking Quashing of Awards in Various Industrial Disputes.
4 Nov 2022...
Search Results for "manufacturing plant"
453 result(s) found
Found 453 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Trade Union's Petition Challenging Transfer of Employees - Transfer Order Not Shown to Be Mala Fide or Unfair Labour Practice Under MRTU and PULP Act. The court held that the union failed to establish a prima facie case for interim relief under Section 30(2) of the MRTU and PULP Act, 1971, as the transfer was a routine management decision.
15 Mar 2016The petitioner, Engineering Workers Association, a registered trade union, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of Ind...
- 113
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Mehandi Manufacturer in Drugs and Cosmetics Act Case — Lack of Sanction and Misapplication of Law. The court held that Mehandi Cones are cosmetics under the Act, but the complaint lacked valid sanction and failed to establish that the product was misbranded or adulterated.
22 Sep 2020The petitioners, M/s Singh Mehandi Industries (a partnership firm) and its managing partner Manohar Singh, filed a petition under Section 482 of the C...
- 108
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Power Developer in Mega Power Policy Customs Duty Exemption Dispute — Press Release Not a Binding Policy Change. The court held that a Press Release reducing the capacity threshold for Mega Power Projects from 1000 MW to 700 MW did not create a binding right to customs duty exemption under Section 25 of the Customs Act, 1962, and the appellant had assumed the risk of policy changes under the RFP.
20 Nov 2024The appeal arose from a judgment of the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (APTEL) dated 30.06.2014, which dismissed the appeal of Nabha Power Limited...
- 453
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against High Court Order Allowing Construction After Lok Adalat Award Demolition. Lok Adalat Award Does Not Bar Subsequent Permitted Construction Under Kerala Panchayath Building Rules, 2011.
24 Apr 2019The appellant, Dr. Cheriyath Jyothi, a resident of Karakulam Gram Panchayath, filed a complaint before the Panchayat Secretary on 6 May 2013 alleging ...
- 46
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Eviction of Multinational Company in Rent Control Case. Section 3(1)(b) of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 exempts premises let to multinational companies from protection of the Act, and concurrent findings of fact are not interfered with under Section 115 CPC.
10 Jul 2015The applicant, Eloff Hansson (India) Pvt. Ltd., was a tenant in office premises in Mumbai. The respondents, landlords, terminated the tenancy in 1993 ...
- 69
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Trade Union's Petition Challenging Rejection of Interim Relief in Transfer Dispute. Industrial Court's Refusal to Stay Transfer Orders Upheld as No Prima Facie Case of Unfair Labour Practice Established Under MRTU and PULP Act.
15 Mar 2016The petitioner, Engineering Workers Association, a registered trade union, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of Ind...
- 117
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Revenue Expenditure Classification for Technical Consultancy and Labour Housing in Income Tax Reference. Payments for feasibility studies and labour welfare held deductible as revenue expenditure under Income Tax Act, 1961.
11 Feb 2016The case pertains to an income tax reference under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, at the instance of the Revenue department. The assessee...
- 91
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Slump Sale Case. Transfer of IMFL Business as Going Concern Not Subject to Capital Gains Tax Under Income Tax Act, 1961.
8 Feb 2012The case involves an appeal by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT)...
- 99
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening of Assessments Under Section 148 for Lack of Fresh Material — Deduction Under Section 80IB Allowed After Scrutiny in Original Assessment. Reopening Based on Same Facts Already Examined Under Section 143(3) Amounts to Change of Opinion and Is Invalid.
8 Feb 2010The petitioner, Purity Techtextile Private Limited, challenged the reopening of its income tax assessments for Assessment Years 2003-2004 and 2004-200...
- 86
