WRIT PETITION (ST) NO. 1338 OF 2020
1 Jan 1970...
Search Results for "lump sum deduction"
169 result(s) found
Found 169 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Bombay Decides Writ Petition Against ONGC's Banning Order. Petitioner Challenges Three-Year Blacklisting on Grounds of Natural Justice Violation.
27 Oct 2016The petitioner, M/s J.K. Surface Coatings Pvt. Ltd., a company engaged in corrosion resistant coating application, challenged a banning order dated 25...
- 27
High Court
High Court of Bombay Upholds Compensation Award in Motor Accident Claim for Child Death — Negligence of ST Bus Driver Established. MSRTC held vicariously liable for death of 10-year-old student hit by bus at bus-stand; compensation of Rs.4,00,000 with 8% interest upheld under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
24 Aug 2023The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by the parents of a 10-year-old boy, Parikshit Bhosale, who died after being hit by a State Transpor...
- 50
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Revision Against MACT Award for Lack of Permission Under Section 170 of Motor Vehicles Act. Insurance Company Cannot Challenge Award on Merits Without Tribunal's Permission When Owner and Driver Are Exparte.
29 Sep 2020The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. filed a Civil Revision Application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the judgment an...
- 62
High Court
Gujarat High Court Upholds Reinstatement of Watchman in Industrial Dispute Case. Labour Court's Award of Reinstatement Without Backwages for Arbitrary Termination Upheld as No Error of Jurisdiction Found.
17 Feb 2026The State of Gujarat and another (petitioners) challenged an award dated 10.04.2018 passed by the Labour Court, Godhra, in Reference (T) No.130 of 201...
- 119
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Insurer's Appeal in Consumer Dispute Over Fire Insurance Claim Limitation and Assessment. Complaint was within limitation as cause of action was continuing due to insurer's subsequent actions like appointment of investigator and correspondence, under Section 24A of Consumer Protection Act, 1986, and NCDRC's award based on surveyor's report was upheld.
18 Aug 2021The dispute arose from a fire insurance claim where the insured, a manufacturer, suffered total destruction of plant, machinery, and stock due to a fi...
- 424
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Partially Allows Contractor's Appeal in Arbitration Dispute Under Arbitration Act, 1940 — Clause 59 of Agreement Does Not Bar Claims for Extra Lead, Non-Supply of Food Grains, Short Supply of Cement, and Stock Materials. Court Restores Arbitrator's Award on Certain Claims, Modifies Interest Rate.
27 Mar 2019The case arises from arbitration proceedings under the Arbitration Act, 1940, concerning three agreements for irrigation works between the appellant c...
- 211
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit, Restores Trial Court's Decree for Money Recovery Instead of Specific Performance. The High Court erred in granting specific performance as the transaction was found to be a loan with collateral security under the Specific Relief Act, 1963.
13 Aug 2019The Supreme Court allowed the appeal by the subsequent purchasers (appellants) against the High Court's decree granting specific performance of an agr...
- 141
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Unsuccessful Party's Section 9 Petition in Arbitration Dispute — Maintainability Upheld After Supreme Court's Home Care Retail Marts Judgment. The court held that a losing party can seek interim measures under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, overruling the earlier Division Bench decision in Dirk India.
6 May 2026The judgment arises from a Commercial Arbitration Petition filed by Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited (ONGC) against Larsen & Toubro Limited (L&...
- 139
High Court
High Court of Bombay Dismisses ONGC's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Vessel Maintenance Contract Dispute — No Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act as Award Not Found to be in Conflict with Public Policy or Patent Illegality. The court upheld the arbitral tribunal's interpretation that the respondent was not liable for pre-existing HOTO defects, as the contract did not impose such liability.
18 Oct 2010The petitioner, Oil & Natural Gas Corpn. Ltd. (ONGC), challenged an arbitral award dated 2nd April, 2008 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conci...
- 50
