Search Results for "last payment"

5181 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5181 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Will in Testamentary Suit, Dismisses Caveat by Heirs. Court Declares Will Dated 3rd December 1988 as Valid Last Will and Testament of Deceased Hiroo @ Hiraji Laxman Jadhav, Orders Issuance of Letter of Administration.

The case pertains to a testamentary dispute concerning the Will of deceased Hiroo @ Hiraji Laxman Jadhav. The plaintiffs, Subhash Hirji Jadhav and his...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Will in Testamentary Suit — Dismisses Caveat by Other Heirs. Will dated 3rd December 1988 executed by deceased Hiroo @ Hiraji Laxman Jadhav proved as last Will and Testament; letter of administration granted to plaintiffs.

The case involves a testamentary dispute concerning the Will of Hiroo @ Hiraji Laxman Jadhav, who died on 3rd December 1988. The plaintiffs, Subhash H...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Sole Executrix in Probate Petition Under Indian Succession Act Over Will's Validity. Failure to Prove Execution Under Section 68 of Evidence Act and Suspicious Circumstances Found Including Testator's Ill Health and Exclusion of Sons.

The litigation originated from an application for probate of an alleged will executed by Edakuda Panankandiyil Narayana Kurup, who passed away on 4 Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Removal of Petitioner's Trade Mark for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Notice Requirement Under Section 25(3) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999. Removal of Trade Mark 'CIPLA' Held Void as Registrar Failed to Send O-3 Notice to Registered Proprietor, Contravening Statutory Mandate.

The petitioner, Cipla Limited, sought a writ of certiorari to quash the removal of its registered trade mark 'CIPLA' from the register and a mandamus ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Renewal of Trademarks Despite Delay, Directs Registrar to Accept Applications. Court holds that failure to issue notice under Section 25(3) of Trade Marks Act, 1999 before removal of marks from register renders removal invalid, and marks must be treated as continuing on register.

The petitioner, Motwane Private Ltd., had registered three trade marks under Nos. 312470, 312472, and 312473, which were renewed up to 17 February 198...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Revocation of Probate Due to Inordinate Delay and Lack of Grounds. Petitioners failed to establish any ground for revocation under Section 263 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, as they were aware of the probate for over 30 years.

The petitioners, who are heirs of the deceased Andrew Satiro D'Cunha, filed a petition under Section 263 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, seeking r...