Search Results for "interim arbitral order"

832 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 832 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Restoring Arbitral Award That Declared Termination of Master Asset Purchase Agreement by Repudiation. Court Holds That Single Judge Exceeded Scope of Section 34 by Reappreciating Evidence and Substituting His Own View.

The appeal arises from a dispute between V Hotels Ltd (appellant) and Siddhivinayak Realties Pvt Ltd (respondent no. 1) concerning a Master Asset Purc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Appeal Against Arbitral Tribunal's Interim Order in Commercial Arbitration Dispute. Court upholds Tribunal's power to grant interim relief under Section 17 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, but modifies order to balance interests of both parties.

The judgment arises from two commercial arbitration petitions filed by Mahaguj Collieries Limited (the petitioner) under Section 37 of the Arbitration...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Tribunal's Interim Order in Bank Guarantee Dispute. Court upholds restraint on encashment of bank guarantee subject to deposit of amount, finding no perversity in the Tribunal's order under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Mahaguj Collieries Limited, filed two arbitration petitions under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challengin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Tribunal's Continuation of Status Quo Order Pending Hearing of Section 17 Application. Tribunal's Order Held to Be Interim Measure, Not Final Determination, and Within Its Jurisdiction Under Section 17 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The appellant, Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI), entered into a franchise agreement with the respondent, Deccan Chronicle Holdings Limited...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 37(2)(b) of Arbitration Act Against Arbitrator's Order Rejecting Interim Relief — Holds That Arbitrator Must Consider Prima Facie Case, Balance of Convenience, and Irreparable Loss Before Refusing Interim Injunction.

The appellant, Spice Digital Ltd., filed an appeal under Section 37(2)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an order dated 16...