Search Results for "government clarificatory letter"

191 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 191 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Reviews Preventive Detention Under COFEPOSA Act for Alleged Smuggling of Red Sanders. Questions Raised Over Violation of Right to Equal Representation and Proper Subjective Satisfaction.

The petition was filed by the wife of the detenu Ajit Bapu Satam, challenging his preventive detention under the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Refund of Court Fees in DRT Proceedings When Main Petition Becomes Infructuous — Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 13. The Debt Recovery Tribunal has inherent power to order refund of court fees under Section 13 of the Court Fees Act, 1870 when the main petition is disposed of as infructuous.

The petitioners, Sri Narayana Murthy H M and Smt. Chandrakala R., filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Interprets Section 175(4) BNSS in Sexual Assault Case Against Police Officers -- Clarifies Public Servant Immunity and Investigation Procedures Under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita

The Supreme Court addressed a criminal appeal involving interpretation of Section 175(4) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) -- The app...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Implementation of 5th Pay Commission Recommendations for Municipal Primary School Staff. Held that the recommendations are not binding on the Municipal Corporation and the petitioners have no vested right to claim such implementation.

The petitioners, two associations registered under the Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950, claiming to represent teaching and non-teaching staff employed i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Union of India Against Arbitral Award in Contract Dispute. Court Upholds Arbitrator's Interpretation of 'Fall Clause' in Repeat Order for Supply of PSC Sleepers Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The case involves an appeal by the Union of India (Central Railway) against an order of a learned Single Judge dismissing its challenge under Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Application and Appoints Arbitrator in MCGM Contract Dispute. Court Holds That Respondent's Failure to Appoint Arbitrator Within 30 Days of Notice Entities Applicant to Court-Appointed Arbitrator Under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The applicant, Kalpataru Projects International Ltd., filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking app...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

CUSTOMS APPEAL NO. 100 OF 2012

...