Search Results for "general concurrence"

520 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 520 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment of Subsequent Purchaser in Suit for Specific Performance and Injunction — Applicant Claiming Title Through Subsequent Agreement Must Be Heard Before Final Orders.

The judgment arises from a chamber summons filed by Mugwort Land Holdings Pvt. Ltd. seeking impleadment as a party defendant in Suit No. 2823 of 2006,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Resolves Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition for 'Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout'. The Petitioners Sought to Quash Preliminary Notification Dated 21.05.2008 and Final Notification Dated 18.02.2010 Issued by Bangalore Development Authority.

A large batch of writ petitions came before the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore, filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Writ Petitions Against Land Acquisition Notifications for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout; Petitioners Seek Quashing of Preliminary and Final Notifications Under BDA Act, 1976.

Multiple writ petitions were filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by various landowners challenging land acquisition proceedi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010000842011_1

The matter comprised a batch of writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore, listed under Writ Petition No. 32186 of 2010 and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses State Appeals Against Grant-in-Aid Claims Under Repealed 1994 Order. Employees of Non-Government Educational Institutions Entitled to Grant-in-Aid Despite Repeal of Orissa (Non Government Colleges, Junior Colleges and Higher Secondary Schools) Grant-in-Aid Order, 1994.

The case involves a batch of civil appeals filed by the State of Odisha against various respondents, who are employees of non-government educational i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal Against Lower Appellate Court's Decree for Non-Compliance with Order XLI Rule 31 CPC. Holds That First Appellate Court Must Independently Assess Evidence and Give Reasons for Each Point; Mere General Concurrence Is Insufficient and Vitiates Judgment.

The dispute originated from a partition suit filed by the respondent-plaintiff, claiming a one-fourth share in ancestral properties as the daughter of...