Search Results for "execution dismissal default"

672 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 672 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Husband Guilty of Contempt for Wilful Disobedience of Maintenance Order. Non-compliance with Family Court's maintenance order for over two years despite notice of contempt petition amounts to wilful disobedience under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

The contempt petition was filed by the wife, Amita B Devnani, against her husband Bhagwan H Devnani and others, alleging wilful disobedience of an ord...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers First Appeal Against Denial of Specific Performance of Land Sale Agreement. The appeal challenges the trial court's finding that the plaintiff failed to prove readiness and willingness and that the contract was validly terminated.

The dispute arose from an agreement for sale of agricultural lands situated at Maranagere Village, Tiptur Taluk. The first defendant, aged about 81 ye...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Cross Execution Applications in Share Sale Dispute, Holds Loan Included in Consideration. The court upheld the decree for specific performance of an email agreement, ruling that the loan amount of Rs.10,32,55,000/- was part of the Rs.36.75 crore consideration.

The case arises from a dispute between two groups, the Kotharis and the Agarwals, who were equal shareholders in a company called Special Ear, Nose an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Appeal for Specific Performance, Upholds Counterclaim for Possession. Plaintiffs failed to prove readiness and willingness to perform sale agreement within reasonable time under Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The appellants, B.Kannan and K.Tamijarassy, were the plaintiffs in a suit for specific performance of an agreement of sale dated 12.07.2006, filed aga...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Rules on Automatic Stay of Arbitral Awards Under Section 26 of the Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2015. The Mere Filing of a Section 34 Petition Does Not Trigger Automatic Stay; Award-Holder Can Execute Unless Stay Granted.

The snippet of the judgment deals with Chamber Summonses in Execution Applications arising from an arbitral award. The dispute involves Enercon GmbH a...