SALES TAX REFERENCE NO. 52 OF 2009
8 Feb 2019The matter came before the Bombay High Court as two sales tax references arising from the assessment of M/s. Radhasons International, a partnership fi...
Search Results for "deeming clause"
811 result(s) found
Found 811 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Juvenile Delinquent Declaration in IPC Offences Case Under Juvenile Justice Act, 2015. Matriculation Certificate Conclusively Establishes Age Under Section 94, Overriding Alleged Discrepancies in School Admission Documents.
18 Nov 2021The appeal arose from a criminal incident on 05.05.2020 where the accused, along with others, allegedly attacked the appellant and his family, resulti...
- 279
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Official Liquidator's Appeal in Property Tax Dispute — Municipal Corporation Cannot Claim Taxes After Winding Up Order Without Prior Adjudication. Held that property tax and water tax claims against company in liquidation are not 'taxes due' under Section 530(1)(a) of Companies Act, 1956 unless assessed and quantified before winding up.
4 May 2023The case involves an appeal by the Official Liquidator of IISCO Ujjain Pipe and Foundry Company Limited (in liquidation) against a judgment of the Cal...
- 149
High Court
High Court of Bombay Rules on Writ Petitions Challenging MRT Order on Tenancy Claim Under Maharashtra Tenancy Act. The decision addresses the validity of the tenancy declaration under Section 70(b) and Section 32G of the Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.
23 Apr 2025The petitioners, who claimed to be Watandars, filed writ petitions in the High Court of Bombay challenging a common order passed by the Maharashtra Re...
- 88
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Validity of Section 29A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Disqualifying Related Parties of Corporate Debtors from Submitting Resolution Plans. The Court holds that the disqualification under Section 29A(c) applies to persons acting jointly or in concert with a disqualified person, and that the provision is not retrospective in operation.
3 Oct 2024The Supreme Court of India delivered a landmark judgment on the interpretation and validity of Section 29A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016...
- 487
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Retrospective Amendment to Sugar Exemption Under Karnataka Sales Tax Act — Imported Sugar Not Exempt. Retrospective amendment to Entry 31 of Fifth Schedule of KST Act, 1957, confining exemption to sugar produced or manufactured in India, held valid and not violative of Articles 14, 19(1)(g), or 301 of Constitution.
1 Jan 2026The appeals arose from a common judgment of the Karnataka High Court which upheld a retrospective amendment to the exemption entry for 'sugar' under t...
- 218
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Activates Dormant Constitutional Provision for Appointment of Ad Hoc Judges to Address High Court Backlog. The Court held that Article 224A of the Constitution of India can be utilized to appoint retired High Court judges as ad hoc judges to tackle over 57 lakh pending cases and 40% vacancies, emphasizing dynamic interpretation and consent requirements.
20 Apr 2021The Supreme Court of India, in a public interest litigation filed by Lok Prahari, addressed the critical issue of backlog in High Courts, with over 57...
- 506
High Court
WRIT PETITION No. 4045 OF 2005
10 Dec 2013The matter arises from a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by the Ahmednagar Municipal Corporation, a local authority...
- 23
High Court
Full Bench of Bombay High Court Considers Whether Section 24(2) of RFCTLARR Act Lapses Acquisitions Under MRTP Act — Reference to Determine Interplay Between Central and State Land Acquisition Laws. The core issue was whether acquisition proceedings initiated under Sections 125-127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 fall within the lapsing provision of the 2013 Central Act.
13 Oct 2017The matter before the Full Bench of the Bombay High Court arose from three writ petitions filed by landowners whose lands were acquired under the prov...
- 64
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition Challenging Green Belt Classification of Jayamahal Palace Hotel in Revised Master Plan 2015. The court held that the BDA's notification classifying the property as green belt was valid and not ultra vires, as the petitioners failed to establish any vested right or arbitrariness in the zoning decision.
15 Dec 2023The petitioners, legal representatives of the late H.H. Jyotendra Sinhji Vikramsinhji, owned properties bearing numbers 1, 1/1, 1/2, 1/3, 2, 3, 4, 5, ...
- 159
