Search Results for "consumer protection rules 2020"

188 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 188 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses PIL Challenging Sale of Housing Board Site, Upholds Validity of Sale Deed and Rejects Review Petition. The court held that the petitioner lacked locus standi and the sale was validly executed by the Karnataka Housing Board in favor of the trust.

The petitioner, Mr. Adinarayanasetty, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, styled as a public interest litig...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Cooperative Bank CEO Appointment Dispute — Upholds Apex Society's Power to Depute Cadre Officers. Section 54(3) of Chhattisgarh Co-Operative Societies Act, 1960 obligates District Central Cooperative Bank to accept CEO deputed by State Cooperative Bank from its cadre.

The dispute arose from the appointment of the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of the first respondent, Zila Sahkari Kendriya Bank Maryadit, a District C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Considers Challenge to MoEF Notification Transferring NGT Jurisdiction Over Goa Matters to Delhi Principal Bench. The Court Examines Legality of Transfer Without Public Consultation and Lack of Alternative Arrangements Under NGT Act.

The High Court of Bombay at Goa took suo motu cognizance on 21st August 2017 upon learning of a notification by the Ministry of Environment, Forest an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Government Contract Dispute Despite Non-Exhaustion of Pre-Arbitration Procedure. Party Autonomy and Minimal Judicial Intervention Upheld Under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The appellant, Hindustan Construction Company Ltd., was awarded a contract by the respondent, Bihar Rajya Pul Nirman Nigam Ltd. (BRPNNL), on 04.03.201...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Appeal Against Dismissal of Notice of Motion in MOFA-MMRDA Dispute. Flat Purchasers Claimed MOFA Rights on Land Owned by MMRDA and Leased to Developer, Which Respondents Disputed as Excluded Under MMRDA Act.

This appeal before the Bombay High Court arose from the dismissal of a Notice of Motion by a learned Single Judge in a suit concerning a plot of land ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Arrest Under PML Act — Validity of Arrest Under Section 19 PML Act Must Be Examined by Trial Court at Remand Stage

The Supreme Court heard an appeal by Arvind Kejriwal challenging his arrest by the Directorate of Enforcement (DoE) under Section 19 of the Prevention...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considered Constitutional Challenge to Maharashtra Land Acquisition Amendment for Bullet Train Project. Petition Raised Questions of Repugnancy Under Article 254, Presidential Assent, Natural Justice, and Scope of Section 33 of the Right to Fair Compensation Act, 2013.

The litigation concerned a challenge to land acquisition for the Mumbai-Ahmedabad High Speed Rail project, commonly called the Bullet Train Project. T...