Search Results for "conciliation under CPC"

510 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 510 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 34 Petitions Challenging Arbitral Awards in Development Agreement Dispute. Court upholds arbitrator's findings on breach of contract and quantum of damages, rejecting grounds of patent illegality and public policy.

The petitioners, Pradyuman Kumar Sharma and Kuber Planters Limited, filed four arbitration petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Execution Application Filed by Claimant Against Respondent in Arbitration Matter — Decision by IMPPA Committee Not an Arbitral Award Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The case involves a chamber summons filed by the respondent, Sanjay Dutt, seeking dismissal of an execution application filed by the claimant, Shakeel...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Section 9 Petition Against Tenant Not Party to Arbitration Agreement. Interim relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 cannot be granted against a third party who is not bound by the arbitration agreement.

The petitioner, Heritage Lifestyles & Developers Pvt. Ltd., filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking int...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses BCCI's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Media Rights Dispute. Court upholds arbitrator's finding that termination of Media Rights License Agreement was illegal and that Nimbus Communications was entitled to damages.

The petitioner, Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI), filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 9 Petition for Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction in Arbitration Dispute. Court holds that no part of cause of action arose within its jurisdiction as contract was executed and performed in Chennai, and arbitration venue was Chennai.

The petitioner, M/s. Roman Tarmat Ltd., filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking an injunction restrain...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in MSMED Act Arbitration Dispute — No Error Apparent on Record. Review Petition under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC fails as petitioner's alternative remedy by way of appeal was availed and withdrawn, and no grounds for review exist.

The petitioner, Microvision Technologies Pvt. Ltd., a supplier under the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 (MSMED Act), had co...