Search Results for "claim repudiation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "claim repudiation"

259 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 259 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Application for Appointment of Arbitrator in Construction Contract Dispute. Court holds that existence of arbitration clause in contract documents is sufficient to refer disputes to arbitration, and that the applicant's claims are not barred by limitation as the contract was not fully terminated.

4 Aug 2023

The applicant, Capacite Infraprojects Ltd, a construction company, filed an application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Enforcement of Continuing Guarantee Against State Government — Limitation Bar Rejected as Guarantee Subsists Until Full Payment. Continuing Guarantee Clause 6 of Deed Dated 5th June 1982 Remains Operative Until All Moneys Paid, Hence Claim Not Barred by Limitation.

1 Feb 2005

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Co-op. Bank Ltd., stood as guarantor for a loan advanced to Swami Vivekanand Kaku Tel Sahakari Karkhana Limited. The...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Arbitral Award in Limitation Dispute Between Contractor and Municipal Corporation. Court holds that cause of action for arbitration arose on rejection of claim by Commissioner on 6th January 2000, not on earlier dates, and thus reference was within limitation.

10 Mar 2023

The case involves two appeals filed by M/s. R.N. Ghanekar & Co. (Appellant) and the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (Respondent) against a com...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revocation of Leave Under Clause 12 Letters Patent and Allows Amendment to Plaint on Jurisdiction. Court holds that jurisdiction is determined by plaint averments as a whole and subsequent amendment cannot cure lack of jurisdiction at the time of filing.

9 Mar 2005

The plaintiff, Infrastructure Leasing & Financial Services Limited, filed a suit in the Bombay High Court for recovery of Rs. 3,72,87,086/- with inter...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Termination of Solid Waste Management Contract for Violation of Natural Justice. Municipal Commissioner's Order Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Contractual Termination Clause and Principles of Audi Alteram Partem.

6 Feb 2019

The petitioner, AG Enviro Infraprojects Private Limited, a company engaged in solid waste management, challenged the order dated 31st October 2018 pas...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Insurance Ombudsman Award for Non-Compliance with Rule 17 and Ignoring Policy Terms. Ombudsman directed insurer to process claim without determining compensation or considering policy exclusions for medical expenses incurred in India.

14 Aug 2024

The petitioner, Tata AIG General Insurance Co. Ltd., challenged an award dated 4 March 2024 passed by the Insurance Ombudsman for Mumbai. The responde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal of Interim Relief in Arbitration Dispute Over IPL Media Rights — No Prima Facie Case for Injunction Established Under Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The court held that the appellant failed to demonstrate a prima facie case for interim relief as the termination of media rights agreements by the respondent was within contractual rights.

23 Feb 2011

The appeal arose from a judgment and order dated December 20, 2010, passed by a learned single Judge of the Bombay High Court in Arbitration Petition ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Insurance Dispute — Wear and Tear Exclusion Not Applicable to Sudden Breakdown. The court held that the insurer failed to prove that the bearing failure was due to wear and tear, and the breakdown was a fortuitous event covered under the Industrial All Risk Policy.

15 Feb 2019

The petitioner, United Phosphorous Limited, was in the business of pesticides and chemicals. It purchased a Gas Turbine Engine from GE Packaged Power ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Insurance Claim Dispute — Fire Caused by Theft Covered Under Standard Fire and Special Perils Policy. The Court held that the proximate cause of the fire was the theft, which is a covered peril, and the exclusion for 'burning by order of any Public Authority' does not apply.

16 Dec 2025

The appellant, a government company, invited tenders for insurance in June 2005. The respondent, was awarded the contract and issued a Standard Fire a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute, Upholding Concurrent Findings on Ownership and Possession. Counterclaim for Ownership Based on Adverse Possession Fails as Appellants Failed to Prove Hostile Possession and Ouster of True Owners.

10 Aug 2010

The case involves a property dispute between two sets of parties over a house and land in Bicholim, Goa. The respondents/plaintiffs (Shaikh Mohammad A...

14 15 16 17 18

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)