Search Results for "agricultural land ceiling"

268 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 268 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Validates Sub-Classification of Scheduled Castes in Landmark Judgment. Upholding Equality Within Equality: Supreme Court Endorses State's Power to Sub-Classify Scheduled Castes for Targeted Reservation.

The Supreme Court of India, in a significant ruling, has upheld the constitutionality of sub-classifying Scheduled Castes for the purpose of reservati...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Suit for Possession and Mesne Profits — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Letters Patent Appeal against decree for possession and mesne profits dismissed as no substantial question of law or perversity found in concurrent findings of fact.

The present Letters Patent Appeal arises from a judgment and decree passed by a Single Judge of the Bombay High Court in First Appeal No. 133/1976, wh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Land Ceiling Revision Case Due to Inordinate Delay. Suo Motu Revision Initiated After 15 Years Without Calling for Record Held Invalid Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961.

The petitioner, Uttamrao Sampatrao Thakur, a resident of Hivara Bk., Majalgaon, Beed, filed returns under Section 12 of the Maharashtra Agricultural L...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Surplus Land Declaration Under Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 — Petitioner Failed to Appear or Argue, No Merit Found.

The petitioner, Vishwanath s/o Narsing Sodgir, a resident of Gangakhed, District Beed, filed a writ petition challenging the declaration of surplus la...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Land Acquisition Case — Compensation Enhanced Due to Inadequate Market Value Assessment. Court Held That Reference Court Erred in Not Considering Comparable Sale Instances and Potential Value of Land for Development Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The case pertains to a writ petition filed by the legal representatives of the original claimant, Sahadeo Mahadik, challenging the judgment and award ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Land Dispute — No Interference Under Article 227 as Findings of Fact Are Not Perverse. The court held that concurrent findings of fact based on evidence cannot be interfered with under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.

The case involves a writ petition filed by the petitioners (heirs of the original plaintiff) challenging the concurrent findings of the lower courts i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Possession and Mesne Profits — Suit for Possession and Mesne Profits Dismissed as Barred by Limitation and Res Judicata

The petitioners (original plaintiffs) filed a suit for possession and mesne profits against the respondents (original defendants) in respect of agricu...