Search Results for "acquisition lapse"

743 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 743 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Summary Judgment in Recovery Suit Against DDA for Refund of Sale Consideration After Land Acquisition Lapses. The Court held that DDA cannot retain the money after failing to convey title due to lapsing of acquisition, and the suit was within limitation.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal against the Delhi High Court's order dismissing the appellant's application for summary judgment under Order XIII...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Declaration of Lapse of Land Acquisition Under Section 24(2) of RFCTLARR Act, 2013 — Petitioner Failed to Demonstrate Non-Compliance with Award or Possession Requirements.

The petitioner, Ramchandra Jamnadas Sadriwala, filed a writ petition before the Gujarat High Court seeking a declaration that the land acquisition pro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Landowners in MRTP Act Reservation Lapse Case; Reservation Deemed Lapsed as Corporation Failed to Acquire Within Six Months of Purchase Notice. Petitioners Argue That Automatic Lapsing Under Section 127 Is Irreversible and Subsequent Notification Void.

The petitioners, owners of a parcel of land bearing CTS Nos. F/189, F/190, F/191, F/192 and Final Plot No. 646, T.P.S. No. III, Bandra, Mumbai, filed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Land Acquisition Case — Proceedings Lapse Under Section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation Act, 2013 as Award Passed After Five Years from Section 4 Notification Under Old Act.

The petitioner, Sheetalkumar Sadashiv Zambare, challenged the land acquisition proceedings initiated by the State of Maharashtra for his lands in Kolh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Land Reservation for Public Garden in Kolhapur Development Plan. Reservation under Section 22 of MRTP Act, 1966 for public garden upheld as valid and not arbitrary, rejecting claims of delay and hardship.

The judgment concerns two connected matters: a writ petition filed by 15 members of the Jamsandekar family and a public interest litigation filed by P...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Reservation on Land Due to Mapping Error and Non-Acquisition. The court quashed the reservation on the petitioner's land as the reservation chart showed a different survey number and no acquisition steps were taken for decades.

The petitioner, an agriculturist aged 77, is a joint owner of agricultural land Gat No. 933 (Old Survey No. 212/1) admeasuring 15R. In 1981, responden...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Land Acquisition Declaration for Sugar Factory Due to Non-Compliance with Section 5A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Collector Failed to Prepare Independent Report or Submit Recommendations, Relying Instead on Beneficiary's Chart, Rendering Section 6 Declaration Invalid.

The petitioners, Sukumar M. Khot and others, challenged a declaration under Section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, published on 23 June 2005, wh...