Search Results for "Telecom Department"

262 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 262 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to Drug Price Control Demand Against Pharmaceutical Company. Cream Vs. Ointment Distinction and Small Scale Industry Exemption Under DPCO 1995 Considered.

The writ petition arose from a dispute concerning the drug price control regime under the Drugs (Price Control) Order, 1995 (DPCO 1995). The first pet...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Tender Award for Lack of Locus Standi. Petitioner who did not participate in tender process cannot challenge the award; tender conditions not arbitrary.

The petitioner, Voith Hydro Private Limited, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of certiorar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Discharges Accused in CBI Case for Alleged Procurement Irregularities in SAFAR Project. Court holds that mere procedural lapses without proof of criminal intent or loss do not constitute offences under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and Indian Penal Code, 1860.

The case arises from a CBI investigation into alleged irregularities in the procurement of Digital Display Systems for the SAFAR project by the Indian...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Sets Aside Land Acquisition for Private Companies Due to Lack of Public Purpose and Favoritism. State's Exercise of Eminent Domain Found to be Misused for Allocating Valuable Land to Private Entities Without Legitimate Industrial Development Goals.

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard a writ appeal challenging a single judge's order dated 06.03.2013 in W.P.No.17211/2009. The appeal was ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Whether Minutes of Meeting Converted Force Majeure Clause into Assured Return Mechanism, Interpreting Clauses 3.4.19 and 3.7.2 of Construction Agreement. Appeal Challenges Arbitral Interpretation That State Must Compensate for Any Toll Collection Drop Exceeding 20%.

The appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 arose from a dispute concerning a build-operate-transfer (BOT) contract for ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition by Foreign Shareholder Challenging Constitutional Validity of Section 272(1)(e) Companies Act, 2013. Section 272(1)(e) is not ultra vires the Constitution; second proviso to Section 272(3) does not apply to petitions under Section 272(1)(e).

The petitioner, Devas Employees Mauritius Private Limited, a company incorporated under the laws of Mauritius and a shareholder of Devas Multimedia Pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Neutral Arbitrator in Railway and Airport Authority Contracts — Unilateral Appointment Clause Invalid. Arbitration clause providing for appointment by General Manager or officer of the same entity violates Section 12(5) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The judgment concerns three matters: two arbitration applications and one arbitration petition, all raising a common question about the validity of ar...