Search Results for "Section 28(1)"

587 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 587 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Transfer of Employees from Municipal Corporation to State Government. Transfer of employees under Section 451 of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 held valid as in public interest and for better administration.

The judgment involves multiple writ petitions filed by employees of the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) challenging their transfer to the Sta...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Strikes Down Caste-Based Discrimination in Prison Manuals as Unconstitutional. Prison Rules Dividing Labour and Segregating Barracks by Caste Violate Articles 14, 15, 17, 21, and 23 of the Constitution.

The petitioner, Sukanya Shantha, a journalist, filed a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution seeking directions for the repeal of offendi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Intra-Court Appeals Against Order Upholding Blocking of Electronic Credit Ledgers Under Rule 86A of CGST Rules; Considers Requirement of Pre-Decisional Hearing and Bonafide Purchaser Protection.

The appeals arose from a common order dated 27.07.2023 passed by a Single Judge in a batch of writ petitions, rejecting the contentions of the appella...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against Admission of Winding-Up Petitions Under Companies Act, 1956 — Held That Company Court Has Discretion to Appoint Provisional Liquidator and That Appeal Against Admission Order Is Not Maintainable Under Section 483 of the Companies Act, 1956.

The judgment concerns a batch of appeals filed by Vision Millennium Exports Pvt. Ltd. against orders of the Company Court admitting winding-up petitio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds State's Levy of Sales Tax on Cane Jaggery While Exempting Palm Jaggery Under Madras Act. Classification Upheld as Cane and Palm Jaggery Are Commercially Different and Tax Does Not Violate Article 14 or 301.

The appellants, dealers in cane jaggery in Tamil Nadu, challenged the levy of sales tax on cane jaggery while palm jaggery remained exempt, under the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Allows Petitioners in DCR Interpretation Case Following Supreme Court's Godrej & Boyce Ruling. The Court Holds That Paragraph 6 of Appendix VII Entitles Owner to DRC Equal to Area of Constructed Amenity, Rejecting Circulars Limiting to 25%.

Background: The consolidated writ petitions were filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay under Article 226 of the Constitution concerning ...