Search Results for "Section 114 CPC"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Section 114 CPC"

427 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 427 result(s)

High Court

Karnataka High Court Examines Constitutional Validity of Amendment to CPC Fixing 120-Day Limit for Written Statement; Challenge to Provisions Curtailing Judicial Discretion and Inherent Powers. The Amendment, Introduced by State Legislature, Allegedly Overrides Supreme Court Ruling and Violates Articles 14 and 141 of the Constitution.

28 Jul 2026

The High Court of Karnataka entertained two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, challenging the constitutional validi...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Wife's Writ Petition in Divorce Proceedings Due to Protracted Litigation and Imposes Costs. Family Court's Order Denying Recall of Witness for Further Cross-Examination Upheld as Wife Had Multiple Opportunities But Caused Deliberate Delay, Violating Court Directions Under Order XVIII Rule 17 CPC.

9 Feb 2026

The dispute originated from a divorce petition filed by the husband in 2019 seeking dissolution of marriage. The wife, as respondent, engaged in protr...

Supreme Court

Secondary Evidence and Power of Attorney in Property Transactions: Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Section 65 Evidence Act and Section 100 CPC i

6 Feb 2026

n Tharammel Peethambaran v. T. Ushakrishnan, the dispute arose from the sale of immovable property executed by the defendant acting as an alleged agen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Stay Application in Arbitral Award Challenge — No Automatic Stay Under Section 36 of Arbitration Act Without Strong Prima Facie Case. Court holds that mere filing of Section 34 petition does not warrant stay; applicant must demonstrate irreparable harm and balance of convenience.

14 Dec 2020

The judgment concerns an interim application filed by Kishor N Shah and others (the Shahs) under Section 36 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Landlords' Eviction Decree in Rent Control Case — Review Maintainable for Error of Law Apparent on Record. Section 106 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882 not applicable to proceedings under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.

15 Sep 2015

The dispute in this writ petition arises from an eviction suit filed by the landlords (respondents) against the tenant (petitioner) under Section 16(1...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Rules on Arbitration Petition No.846 of 2014 Under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act. The Court Considers Whether the Arbitral Award Dated 22 March 2014 Should Be Set Aside in Light of Various Share Sale Agreements Between the Parties.

24 Apr 2015

The matter before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay arose from an arbitration petition filed by Haresh Advani under Section 34 of the Arbitration...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Amendment of Plaint in Eviction Suit — Pre-Trial Amendment Allowed Under Order VI Rule 17 CPC as No Prejudice Caused to Tenant. Amendment of plaint to clarify property description and add alternative grounds was permissible at pre-trial stage to determine real controversy between landlord and tenant.

10 Oct 2014

The petitioner, M/s K.T. Kubal & Company, a tenant, challenged the order of the Small Causes Court allowing the respondent/plaintiff to amend the plai...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Considers Challenge to Arbitral Award in Construction Subcontract Dispute. Petition filed by main contractor against subcontractor's award under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

21 Mar 2013

Patel Engineering Co. Ltd (PEC) challenged an arbitral award dated 25 January 2010 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 in t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Possessors to Pay Decretal Amount to Avoid Auction in Execution Proceedings. Decree Holder Cannot Insist on Auction When Possessor Willing to Satisfy Decree Under Order 21 Rules 64 and 83 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

6 Jun 2011

The petitioners, Lalit Malick, Shyam Malick, and Madhu Bhatti, filed a writ petition challenging the execution proceedings of a decree passed in Comme...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Amendment Application in Suit for Possession and Mesne Profits Due to Inordinate Delay and Lack of Due Diligence. Amendment to Written Statement Seeking to Introduce Adverse Possession Defence After 22 Years and After Evidence Closed Held to Be Highly Prejudicial and Not Necessary for Determination of Real Controversy Under Order 6 Rule 17 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment arises out of a Chamber Summons filed by the defendant in a pending suit for possession and mesne profits. The plaintiff, Banganga Cooper...

14 15 16 17 18

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)