Search Results for "Representation disposal"

2127 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2127 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Directs Tahsildar to Consider Representation on Alleged Land Encroachment Within Three Months. Duty of Statutory Authority to Consider Representation Under Article 226 of Constitution of India and Land Encroachment Act.

The petitioner, Baratha Muthu, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Directs Authorities to Consider Representation for Permission to Conduct Kida-Mutu Cultural Event During Temple Festival. Non-consideration of representation by statutory authority amounts to dereliction of duty, warranting direction under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

The petitioner, Kida-Mutuvor Sangam, represented by its Secretary C. Ganesan, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India bef...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Lack of Material to Show Public Order Threat. Theft of sand and IPC offences held to be law and order issues, not public order.

The petitioner, Narayan Radhakishan Bhusari, challenged his preventive detention under Section 3 of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Directs Tahsildar to Consider Representation on Encroachment Allegations in Public Pathway. Non-consideration of representation by statutory authority amounts to dereliction of duty, justifying a writ of mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioner, N.G. Seenivasan, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Cour...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Directs Consideration of Representation for Removal of Encroachments on Public Pathway — Mandamus Issued Under Article 226. Statutory Authority Must Consider Representation on Merits; Non-Consideration Amounts to Dereliction of Duty.

The petitioner, Dravidaselvi, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allots Special Civil Application Challenging Baroda Cricket Association Election Candidates' Eligibility. Court Grants Ad-Interim Relief Permitting Voting but Restrains Counting of Votes Pending Final Disposal of Petition.

The present matter before the Gujarat High Court concerned a challenge to the candidature of four individuals for the posts of President, Secretary, a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Directs Authorities to Consider Representation on Encroachment Allegations in Government Poramboke Land. Writ of Mandamus Issued for Consideration of Representation Under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

The petitioner, B. Kannan, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court seek...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Section 13 of Family Courts Act, 1984 as Unconstitutional. The court held that Section 13 does not impose an absolute bar on legal representation and is consistent with the Constitution, following established precedent.

The writ petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution by Vijaya Vaishnavi Sriram seeking a declaration that Section 13 of the Family Court...