Search Results for "Prosecutrix testimony"

517 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 517 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Section 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Jinnasrao s/o Govindrao Magre, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Jalna for an offence punishable under Section 376 of the Indian Pen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Victim Testimony and Lack of Medical Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 4 and 8 of POCSO Act, 2012 set aside as medical evidence did not support penetration and delay in FIR was unexplained.

The appellant, Ganesh Kisan Navale, was convicted by the Special Judge under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO) for sex...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape and Acid Attack Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 376 and 326 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Forcible Sexual Intercourse and Pouring of Acid Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Sadashio s/o Rengo Kotangale, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Bhandara, in Sessions Trial 82 of 2012 for offences punis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Tanaji Baburao Phalke, was convicted by the 5th Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, for an offence punishable under Section 376 of the Ind...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Vilas Sahebrao Gilbile, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Osmanabad in Sessions Case No. 47/2010 for offences under Secti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Gang Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(g) IPC and SC/ST Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case involves three appeals against the judgment and order of the Additional Sessions Judge, Ambajogai, in Sessions Case No.50/2012. The appellant...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Consent and Age Discrepancy Cast Doubt on Prosecution Case, Leading to Acquittal Under Section 376 IPC and Section 6 POCSO Act.

The appellant, Mahesh Bhimraj Jadhav, was convicted by the Designated Court under the POCSO Act for the rape of a 17-year-old girl. The prosecution al...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal of Accused in Rape and Abetment to Suicide Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence. Prosecution Fails to Prove Rape or Abetment as Dying Declaration and Medical Evidence Contradict the Allegations.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of Amit Dhanraj Kadamdhad and Umesh Dhanraj Kadamdhad (respondents) by the Adhoc Additional Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals and Upholds Conviction in Gang Rape Case Under Sections 363 and 376(D) IPC. DNA Analysis of Undergarment Stains Proved Guilt of All Four Accused, Trivializing Contradictions in Victim’s Narration and Test Identification Failures.

Background: The appeals arose from the conviction of four men by the Additional Sessions Judge, Bhandara, in Special Criminal (Child) Case No. 14 of 2...