Search Results for "Maharashtra Excise"

882 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 882 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Trademark Infringement Suit Over 'THE ASWA' and 'ASĀVA' Marks — No Prima Facie Case for Injunction Due to Lack of Phonetic Similarity and Descriptive Nature of Mark.

The appellant, Meher Distilleries Private Limited, is the registered proprietor of the trademark 'THE ASWA' under Registration No.2716867 in Class-33 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal of Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Search Provisions. Failure to Follow Sections 41(2) and 42 of NDPS Act Renders Recovery of Ganja Invalid, Accused Acquitted.

The appeal was filed by the original complainant, the Superintendent of Central Excise & Customs Preventive, Satara, challenging the judgment and orde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Petition Challenging Settlement Commission Order in Customs Duty Evasion Case. Settlement Commission's order upheld as valid exercise of power under Section 127B of Customs Act, 1962, with no jurisdictional error or illegality.

The Union of India, through the Commissioner of Customs (Import), Jawaharlal Nehru Custom House, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 25th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Customs Demand Against Ex-Director for Company Dues — No Personal Liability Without Statutory Provision. Section 142(1)(c)(ii) of Customs Act, 1962 does not authorise recovery from a former director who ceased to be associated with the company before the demand.

The petitioner, Purshottam Das Gupta, an 86-year-old senior citizen, was formerly a director of Sujata Verbatim Limited (later renamed PDG Infotech Li...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Jurisdiction of Customs Settlement Commission Under Sections 127A and 127B of the Customs Act, 1962 in Ten Writ Petitions. Whether Settlement Commission’s Authority Extends Beyond Short Levy Due to Misclassification to Cases Involving Fraud Is the Central Question.

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay heard ten writ petitions together, all involving a common legal question concerning the jurisdiction of the Set...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Pre-Deposit Order in Cenvat Credit Case — Directs Reconsideration of Appeal Without Pre-Deposit. Conditional waiver of pre-deposit set aside as petitioners demonstrated financial hardship and prima facie case.

The petitioners, M/s. Goradia Special Steels Ltd. and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeals in Service Tax on Maintenance Charges — Management, Maintenance or Repair Service Not Attracted. Amounts collected as maintenance charges for upkeep of apartment premises are not subject to service tax under the Finance Act, 1994.

The judgment involves three appeals filed by the Commissioner of Service Tax/Central Excise against orders of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appell...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Conviction in Drug Trafficking Case Under NDPS Act. Appellant's Voluntary Statement Under Section 67 and Foreign Seizure Evidence Are Primary Bases for Trial Court's Verdict.

The High Court of Bombay heard Criminal Appeal No.783 of 2000 against the judgment of the Special Judge, NDPS, Mumbai, dated October 11, 2000, in NDPS...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Cess Paid Under Protest in Excise Matter — Unjust Enrichment Principle Not Applicable to Cess Under IDR Act. Section 11-B of Central Excise Act Held Inapplicable to Cess Collected Under Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951, and Refund Directed with Interest.

The petitioners, Shree Vidhya Paper Mills and Mr. Rameshwarlal Motilal, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking refund of Rs. 10,19,246...