Search Results for "Larger Bench"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Larger Bench"

3852 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3852 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Writ Appeal Against Single Judge's Dismissal of Petition on Extension of Tenure of Raichur Municipal Councillors. Appeal Focuses on Interpretation of Section 503 of Karnataka Municipal Corporation Act and Exclusion of Administrator Period from Five-Year Term.

28 Apr 2026

The writ appeal arose from the dismissal of W.P.No.202910/2025 by the learned Single Judge of the High Court of Karnataka, which had been filed by 23 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Parole Eligibility Rule in Negotiable Instruments Act Case. Rule 14 of Maharashtra Prisons (Furlough and Parole) Rules, 2024 requiring one year actual imprisonment for parole eligibility held valid; petitioner convicted under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 not entitled to parole before completing one year.

4 May 2026

The petitioner, Vinodkumar Chellappan Pillai, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, Circu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Maintainability of Writ Petition Under Article 226 Against NGT Orders, Rejects Absolute Bar Under Section 18 of NGT Act. The court held that the National Green Tribunal is a tribunal, not a court, and its orders are amenable to writ jurisdiction, and that the remedy of appeal to the Supreme Court does not oust the High Court's power of judicial review.

21 Sep 2022

The Goa Foundation, an environmental NGO, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before the Bombay High Court challenging the constitutional validit...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Possession Under Section 6 of Specific Relief Act, 1963 — Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Prior Possession and Dispossession Within Six Months. Court Held That Summary Suit Under Section 6 Cannot Be Used to Decide Title and Requires Strict Proof of Possession and Unlawful Dispossession.

4 May 2012

The plaintiffs, including Amod Nandkishore Mehra and others, filed a suit under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, seeking restoration of pos...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Adjudicates Batch of Appeals Involving Transit Fee Levied by Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand and Madhya Pradesh Under Indian Forest Act, 1927. Appeals Arise from Differing High Court Decisions on Validity of Transit Rules Framed Under Section 41.

1 Aug 2026

The Supreme Court addressed a batch of cases concerning the levy of transit fee on forest produce. The matter involved three States: Uttar Pradesh, Ut...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Union of India in Section 17A Challenge — Prior Approval Requirement for Investigating Public Servants is Constitutionally Valid. Read Down to Mandate Independent Screening; Lokpal to Approve for Covered Public Servants.

1 Jan 1970

The writ petition was filed by the Centre for Public Interest Litigation challenging the constitutional validity of Section 17A of the Prevention of C...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Examines Whether Amended Section 6 of Hindu Succession Act, 1956 Operates Retrospectively. The Correctness of the Division Bench Decision in Vaishali Satish Ganorkar Holding Prospective Operation is Challenged, with Parties Citing Supreme Court Precedents.

9 Jun 2014

This matter comprises a batch of second appeals before the Bombay High Court, Civil Appellate Jurisdiction, presided over by Justice R.G. Ketkar. The ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation for Widow and Minor Child in Motor Accident Claim — Negligence of Lorry Driver Established. The court modified the Tribunal's award under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, increasing compensation from Rs. 6,50,000 to Rs. 8,50,000 for the death of a pedestrian due to rash driving.

9 Dec 2016

The case involves an appeal by the claimants, Shantavva (widow) and Veerbhadrappa (minor son), against the judgment and award dated 04.03.2015 passed ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Hears Builders' Challenge to Provident Fund Coverage of Casual Construction Workers. Para 26(2) Amendment to Provident Fund Scheme Removes Waiting Period, Requiring Membership from Date of Joining.

28 Feb 2006

Three writ petitions were filed by builders—Sandeep Dwellers Pvt. Ltd., M/s. R.B. Constructions, and Builders Association of India with its members�...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Determines Territorial Jurisdiction of Labour Courts Under MRTU Act for Employees Outside Maharashtra. The Court considers whether the principle that situs of employee determines jurisdiction (GlaxoSmithKline) is overruled by subsequent Supreme Court rulings.

3 Nov 2025

The High Court of Bombay heard a batch of matters, including Appeal No.585 of 2009 and several writ petitions, involving employees and trade unions fr...

14 15 16 17 18

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)