CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.3931 OF 2016
14 Dec 2016The petitioner, a former PWD Minister of Maharashtra, filed a habeas corpus petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenging his ar...
Search Results for "Finance Act amendments"
580 result(s) found
Found 580 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Corporate Debtor's Appeal Against NCLT Order Admitting Insolvency Application Under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. Maharashtra Act Moratorium Does Not Bar Insolvency Proceedings as Section 238 of the Code Overrides Inconsistent State Laws.
1 Aug 2026The appeal arose from the first application under the newly enacted Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The corporate debtor, a multi-product compan...
- 80
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Challenge Against Excessive Enrolment Fees by State Bar Councils — Additional Fees Beyond Section 24(1)(f) of Advocates Act Held Unconstitutional. The Court ruled that SBCs cannot impose any extra charges at enrolment, as the statutory fee is exhaustive and any additional levy violates Articles 14 and 19(1)(g).
30 Jul 2024The Supreme Court in this judgment addressed a challenge under Article 32 of the Constitution against the enrolment fees charged by State Bar Councils...
- 455
High Court
Karnataka High Court Hears Appeal Against Interim Stay of Excise Rule Amendments. State Challenges Ad Interim Order Staying Amended Rules 5 and 5-A of Karnataka Excise (Sale of Indian and Foreign Liquor) Rules, 1968, Introduced by Second Amendment Rules, 2025.
15 Apr 2026The State of Karnataka filed a writ appeal under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961 against an ad interim order dated 25.11.2025 passed b...
- 37
High Court
Karnataka High Court Delivers Order on Writ Petitions Challenging DGFT Policy Circulars on SEIS Eligibility and Show Cause Notices. The Court Addresses the Ultra Vires Nature of Circulars No. 06/2018 and 08/2018 under Foreign Trade Policy 2015-2020.
25 Apr 2024Two writ petitions were filed before the Karnataka High Court challenging the validity of Policy Circulars No. 06/2018 dated 22.05.2018 and No. 08/201...
- 43
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Pronounces Order in Writ Petition Challenging Reservation in Government Tenders for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes. Petitioner Asserts that Amendment to Section 6 of Karnataka Transparency in Public Procurements Act, 1999 and Insertion of Rule 27(A) Providing 17.15% and 6.95% Reservation for SC/ST in Works up to ₹50 Lakhs Violates Constitutional Rights.
20 Dec 2019The petitioner, a Class-I contractor enrolled with the Karnataka Public Works Department since 2008-09, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 2...
- 73
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Auction Sale Under SARFAESI Act — Petitioner Failed to Deposit 25% of Sale Price. Condition Precedent Under Rule 9(3) of Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002 Not Fulfilled, and Alternative Remedy Under Section 17 of SARFAESI Act Available.
23 Dec 2025The petitioner, an individual aged about 70 years, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court c...
- 135
High Court
Full Bench of Bombay High Court Considers Whether Section 24(2) of RFCTLARR Act Lapses Acquisitions Under MRTP Act — Reference to Determine Interplay Between Central and State Land Acquisition Laws. The core issue was whether acquisition proceedings initiated under Sections 125-127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 fall within the lapsing provision of the 2013 Central Act.
13 Oct 2017The matter before the Full Bench of the Bombay High Court arose from three writ petitions filed by landowners whose lands were acquired under the prov...
- 53
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Challenging DICGC Act Provisions in Cooperative Bank Deposit Insurance Dispute. Sections 18A(5) and 21(3)(4) of the Deposit Insurance and Credit Guarantee Corporation Act, 1961, held constitutional and not arbitrary.
28 Apr 2026The appellant, Sri G.K. Gururaja Rao, Secretary of Sri Guru Raghavendra Sahakara Bank Niyamitha, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Consti...
- 208
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Service Tax on Onsite Work at Customer's Premises Under Export of Service Rules, 2005. The court held that onsite work at customer's premises abroad qualifies as 'Service Provided from India' under Rule 3(2)(a) of the Export of Service Rules, 2005, and the appellants are entitled to refund of service tax paid.
15 Sep 2014The case involves appeals by Tech Mahindra Limited and other assessees against the order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CE...
- 72
