Search Results for "Extended limitation"

1845 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1845 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Section 34 Application in MSMED Act Arbitration. Court Holds That Section 34 Application Is Maintainable and Limitation Period Under Section 34(3) Applies.

The appellant, M/s. Ravindranath GE Medicate Associate Private Limited, issued a work order dated 9th January 2008 to the respondent, M/s. Clean Coats...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Appeal in Commercial Dispute Over Berth Reservation Agreement — Restores Arbitral Award. Court Holds That Arbitral Tribunal's Findings on Limitation and Merits Were Not Perverse and Did Not Warrant Interference Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The appellant, M/s.X-Press Container Lines (UK) Ltd., entered into a Berth Reservation Agreement with the respondent, the Board of Trustees of the Por...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Application for Appointment of Arbitrator in Media Agency Contract Dispute. Rejects Limitation Objection as Not Ex-Facie Time-Barred, Holding That Limitation Is a Mixed Question of Fact and Law to Be Decided by the Arbitrator.

The applicant, TLG India Pvt. Ltd., filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of a sole...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition Challenging Extension of Arbitral Mandate Under Section 29-A(5) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Demise of Arbitrator and Insolvency of Party Held Sufficient Cause for Extension Despite Lack of Consent Under Section 29-A(3).

The petitioners, Scape Marketing Private Limited and others, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Bombay High Court Condonation of Delay in Filing Arbitration Challenge" "Justice Arif S. Doctor condones a 14-day delay in filing under Section 34, interpreting procedural requirements for signed arbitral awards in light of mandatory statute compliance."

1. Introduction and Parties The case involves the Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority (MMRDA) as the petitioner and Mumbai Metro One Pvt...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Hears Writ Petition Challenging Condonation of Delay in Filing Arbitration Application Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act. Dispute Centers on Whether Limitation Runs from Original Award or Belated Correction Order When Section 33 Application Filed Beyond 30 Days.

The writ petitions challenged the order of the Commercial Court condoning the delay in filing arbitration suits under Section 34 of the Arbitration an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Upholds Arbitral Award in Favor of Oil Corporation in Kerosene Supply Contract Dispute. Arbitrator Had Rejected Limitation Defense Under Contractual Clause and Held Clause Not Void Under Section 28 of Indian Contract Act.

The matter arose from an arbitration petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by the original respondent in the ...