Search Results for "Asset Recovery"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Asset Recovery"

484 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 484 result(s)

High Court

High Court Appoints Arbitrator and Grants Interim Relief in Loan Default Case Under Arbitration and SARFAESI Acts. Applicant Secures Protection for Mortgaged Property in Dispute with Respondents

2 Feb 2026

The High Court of Bombay heard two connected applications filed by Tata Capital Housing Finance Limited against Inderjeet Sahni and others. The first ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows EPF Authority to Auction Defaulting Employer's Property Despite Bank's Secured Interest Under SARFAESI Act. Priority of EPF Dues Over Secured Creditors Under Section 11(2) of EPF Act Upheld.

17 Dec 2025

The Central Board of Trustees, Employees Provident Fund (Petitioner) filed a writ petition seeking auction of the property of Respondent No.2 (the emp...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Canara Bank's Writ Petition Seeking Removal of Encumbrance Created by Commercial Tax Department on Mortgaged Property. Priority of Bank's Mortgage Over Statutory Charge Under Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 Upheld.

23 Sep 2025

The petitioner, Canara Bank, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus directing the St...

High Court

Bombay High Court hears Writ Petition filed by Prime Downtown Estates Pvt Ltd. against Omkara Assets Reconstruction Company Pvt. Ltd. and others concerning SARFAESI Act, 2002. The petition challenges enforcement of security interest by asset reconstruction companies.

7 Apr 2025

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal by Union Bank of India in SARFAESI Act Matter — Endorsement Declining One-Time Settlement Not a 'Decision' Under Section 17(1) of SARFAESI Act, 2002. Writ Petition Challenging Bank's Endorsement Held Not Maintainable Due to Alternative Remedy Before DRT.

29 Nov 2024

The case involves a writ appeal filed by Union Bank of India (appellants) against an order dated 02.05.2023 passed by a learned Single Judge of the Ka...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Admiralty Suit for Arrest of Vessel — Sets Aside Ex-Parte Order of Arrest for Non-Disclosure of Material Facts. Court holds that a plaintiff seeking arrest of a vessel must make full and frank disclosure of all material facts, including the existence of an arbitration agreement and the vessel's status as a River-Sea Vessel under the Merchant Shipping Act, 1958.

19 Aug 2022

The case involves an appeal by the defendants, MT Pamboor 2 (the vessel) and Shiny Shipping & Logistics Private Limited, against an ex-parte order of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows State's Petition Challenging NCLT Order De-freezing MPID Attached Accounts. MPID Act Overrides IBC for Attachment and Confiscation of Properties of Financial Establishments.

9 Nov 2020

The State of Maharashtra, through the Deputy Collector and Competent Authority (NSEL), filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constit...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in SARFAESI Act Case — Technical Defect in Demand Notice Not Fatal When No Prejudice Caused. The Court held that a mere inadvertent use of a different group company name on the demand notice does not invalidate proceedings under the SARFAESI Act if the borrower was not misled and no substantial prejudice was caused.

1 Jan 2020

The appeal arose from a dispute between M/s. L&T Housing Finance Limited (appellant) and M/s. Trishul Developers and another (respondents) concerning ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Official Liquidator's Report in Winding Up of Transpower Engineering Ltd. — Holds Sale by Liquidator is Formal Transfer Not Subject to Differential Premium. Court exercises powers under Section 446(2) of Companies Act, 1956 to waive extension charges claimed by MIDC.

26 Jul 2018

The Official Liquidator filed a report seeking directions regarding the sale of two industrial plots allotted by MIDC to Transpower Engineering Ltd. (...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging SARFAESI Auction for Non-Compliance with Undertaking. Failure to Pay Agreed Amount and Challenge Auction Notice After Possession Constitutes Waiver of Right to Challenge Under Section 13(4) of Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002.

31 Jan 2005

The petitioners, Mr. Manoj D. Kapasi and Ruby Coach Building Company, owed Rs.3,64,78,000 to respondent No.2 bank. The bank issued a notice under Sect...

14 15 16 17 18

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)