Search Results for "criminal trial standard"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "criminal trial standard"

1948 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1948 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Appellants in Murder Case Based on Eye-Witness Testimony and Medical Evidence — Illicit Relationship Motive Established. The court affirmed the life imprisonment sentence under Section 302 IPC read with Section 34 IPC, finding the evidence of PW-5 and PW-7 credible and corroborated by medical evidence and recovery of weapons.

8 Aug 2019

The case pertains to the murder of Bhimraya on 14.06.2002 at about 09:00 am. The appellants, Mallikarjun (accused No.1), Ravi (accused No.2), and Bala...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Part, Converts Murder Conviction to Culpable Homicide Not Amounting to Murder in Property Dispute Assault. Single Axe Blow on Head Without Premeditation or Intention to Kill Reduces Offence from Section 302 IPC to Part I of Section 304 IPC.

5 Jan 2024

The case arises from a property dispute between two brothers, Ramesh (appellant no.1) and Gajanan (deceased), who lived adjacent to each other. On 9 J...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Criminal Appeal Against Conviction Under Sections 354, 307, 506 IPC — Final Decision Not Available in Extracted Text. The Court's Reasoning and Outcome Were Not Provided in the Excerpt.

8 Sep 2016

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, heard a criminal appeal filed by the original accused against his conviction by the Addition...

High Court

Section 6 Specific Relief Act – Proof of Possession Mandatory.

5 Mar 2026

This case arose from a dispute over possession of a dispensary premises in Mumbai between family members. The plaintiffs claimed that they were in set...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal of Seller and Manufacturer in Food Adulteration Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 13(2) of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954. Failure to Send Sample to Director of Central Food Laboratory Renders Public Analyst Report Inadmissible.

8 Apr 2011

The case pertains to an appeal filed by the Maharashtra Government through the Food Inspector against the judgment and order of acquittal dated 14.3.2...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Grants Bail to Accused Summoned Under Section 319 CrPC in Murder Case - Sets Higher Evidentiary Standard for Bail in Section 319 Proceedings

7 Jan 2026

The Supreme Court heard two connected criminal appeals regarding bail matters in a murder case -- The first appeal was filed by MD Imran @ D.C. Guddu ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 7 and Section 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as demand and acceptance of bribe not proved beyond reasonable doubt.

30 Jul 2012

The appellant, Yashwant Sambhaji Dadmal, a police constable, was convicted by the Special Judge, Chandrapur in Special Case No.6 of 1999 for offences ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case, Sets Aside Acquittal. Presumption under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 applies when signature on cheque is admitted, shifting burden on accused to rebut existence of debt.

10 Mar 2010

The appellant, Bapurao s/o Motiram Mankar, a senior citizen, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 against respo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302, 201, 406 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove chain of circumstances beyond reasonable doubt.

5 May 2010

The appellant, Dinesh s/o Bhagwan Bharwad, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Shahada for offences under Sections 302, 201 and 406 of the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Modifies Conviction from Dacoity to Robbery with Hurt in Appeal Against Sessions Court Judgment. Appellant Convicted Under Section 394 IPC Instead of Sections 395 and 397 IPC as Prosecution Failed to Prove Presence of Five Persons for Dacoity.

29 Aug 2006

The appellant, Balu Pandharinath Takle, was one of four accused charged with dacoity under Sections 395 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, for al...

156 157 158 159 160

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)