Search Results for "unreliable evidence"

2510 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2510 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Eyewitness Testimony. Conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness's evidence was inconsistent and uncorroborated.

The case involves three appellants, Bablya Baliram Madhvi, Namdeo Padu Gaikwad, and Sanjay Arjun Ahire, who were convicted by the 3rd Additional Sessi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellants for Robbery Under Section 392 IPC. Identification by Witnesses and Recovery of Stolen Property Sufficient to Sustain Conviction.

The case involves two criminal appeals arising from a common judgment of conviction dated 24.3.2004 passed by the 1st Ad hoc Additional Sessions Judge...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Age of Victim. Conviction under Sections 363, 377, 323 IPC and Section 4 POCSO Act set aside as prosecution failed to establish victim's minority and guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Pankaj Dadarao Ambadkar, was convicted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-1 & Special Judge, Achalpur in Special (POCSO) Case No....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Motive. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Circumstantial Evidence Lacked Completeness and Chain of Events.

The appellant, Pravin Narayan Patil, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for the murder of a person and sentenced to life i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Extrajudicial Confession. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as extrajudicial confession was not corroborated by any other evidence and the circumstances did not conclusively point to guilt.

The appellant, Ishwar Masram, a member of the State Reserve Police Force, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of h...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Parents for Murder of Daughter in Love Affair Dispute. Circumstantial Evidence Including Last Seen and Recovery Sufficient to Prove Homicide Under Sections 302 and 201 IPC.

The appellants, Mohammad Munna Sardar Khan and Shehnaz Banu Mohd. Khan, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, for the murde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Rape of Minor in Absence of Direct Evidence of Penetration. Circumstantial Evidence and Medical Report Sufficient to Prove Guilt Under Section 376(2)(f) IPC.

The appellant, Deepak Shankarrao Borkar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Wardha, in Special Case No. 7 of 2012 for offences under Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Sentence for Murder and Criminal Intimidation Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Dying Declaration. Conviction under Sections 302 and 506 IPC confirmed as prosecution proved chain of circumstances leading to guilt of accused.

The appellant, Prakash Suryakant Lad, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Sindhudurg, for the murder of Sadhana Ahir and for criminal intimidation. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Acquits Husband in Dowry Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Cruelty and Abetment. Conviction under Sections 498A and 306 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove harassment or instigation leading to suicide.

The appellant, Dilipbhai Manglabhai Varli, was convicted by the learned District Judge, Valsad, in Sessions Case No.90 of 2002 for offences under Sect...