Search Results for "property fraud"

2425 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2425 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Stay of Departmental Enquiry During Criminal Trial in EPF Fraud Case. Held that departmental proceedings and criminal trial can proceed simultaneously as charges are distinct and no prejudice is caused to the delinquent employee.

The petitioner, Shiva Shankar Mamidi, a Data Processing Assistant in the Employees Provident Fund Organization (EPFO), challenged an interim order of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Restores Arbitral Award in Favour of Claimant. Court Holds That Single Judge Erred in Reappreciating Evidence and Interfering with Arbitrator's Findings on Quantum and Interest.

The case involves an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Paramount Limited (appellant) against the judgmen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes BMC Demolition Order for Violation of Natural Justice. Petitioners' structure demolished without notice under Section 354 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, and court orders restoration.

The petitioners, occupiers of a plot of land in Jogeshwari, Mumbai, challenged an order dated 15 June 2023 passed by the Executive Engineer of the Bri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Mutation Entry Based on Unregistered Will — Revenue Authorities Directed to Delete Entry and Restore Original Names. Mutation Entry Does Not Confer Title; Revenue Authorities Must Follow Procedure Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966.

The petitioners, thirteen residents of Ghatshendra, Kannad, filed a writ petition challenging the mutation of their names in the revenue records in re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction in Favor of Plaintiff in Trademark Infringement Suit Over STIMULIV vs STIMULET. Marks Held Deceptively Similar Despite Differences in Pharmaceutical Formulation and Therapeutic Use.

The dispute involves two pharmaceutical companies: Franco Indian Pharmaceuticals Pvt Ltd (Plaintiff) and Corona Remedies Pvt Ltd (Defendant). The Plai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Appeal Against Acquittal in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Failure to Prove Debt. Complainant failed to establish legally enforceable debt or liability under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 as the cheque was given as security for a business transaction.

The case involves an appeal by the complainant, Shankar Jaganath Mane, against the acquittal of the accused, Sikkandar Mohammed Bidiwala, for an offen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Magistrate's Order Directing FIR Registration Under IPC Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B — Magistrate's Power Under Section 156(3) CrPC to Order Investigation Upheld Despite Prior Charge-Sheet in Related Matter.

The petitioner, Mahendra s/o Kanhaiyyalal Jain, filed four criminal writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution and Section 482 of the Code o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eyewitness Testimony. Conviction under Section 302 read with 34 IPC set aside as evidence of sole eyewitness was inconsistent and uncorroborated.

The case involves an appeal against conviction under Section 302 read with 34 IPC for murder. The prosecution case relied heavily on the testimony of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Condonation of Delay in Trust Amalgamation Dispute. Delay of Over Two Years in Filing Appeal Under Section 72 of Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950 Not Sufficiently Explained.

The petitioners, beneficiaries of a public trust (Masjid), challenged an order dated 7.4.1988 passed by the 3rd Additional District Judge, Ahmednagar,...