WRIT PETITION NO.1430 OF 2011
1 Jan 1970...
Search Results for "state"
37674 result(s) found
Found 37674 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Criminal Appeals Against Conviction of Police Officers for Custodial Death and Fabrication of Suicide. Trial Court Found Accused Guilty Under Sections 302, 342, 220, 120-B IPC for Illegal Detention, Assault, and Hanging of Deceased to Cover Up Custodial Killing.
6 May 2011The Bombay High Court at Goa heard criminal appeals filed by two convicted police officers against their conviction and sentence for the custodial dea...
- 57
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Decides State's Appeal Against Acquittal for Offences Under IPC Sections 376(2)(f), 376(2)(k), 354, 354A, 354B, 341, 342. Case Involved Alleged Sexual Assault by Editor-in-Chief on Employee During THiNK Fest 2013.
6 Aug 2026The State of Goa filed an appeal against the acquittal of the respondent, the Editor-in-Chief of Tehelka magazine, who was charged with sexual assault...
- 24
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Order and Certificate of Registration of Co-operative Society. Petitions Under Article 226 Seek to Quash Registration Under Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960, with Connected Interim Applications for Impleadment and Modification of Status Quo Orders.
22 Apr 2021These three writ petitions were filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Ordinary Original ...
- 19
High Court
Bombay High Court Examines Public Interest Litigation Challenging Lavasa Hill Station Project and Statutory Approvals. Petition Raises Issues of Compliance with Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, Special Regulations for Hill Station Development, and Approval of Water Weirs on Varasgaon Dam Backwaters.
26 Feb 2022The judgment under consideration stems from a Public Interest Litigation filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay. The petitioner, a legal ...
- 31
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considered Writ Petition for Writ of Mandamus to Recognize Ownership of Scheme No.51 Premises. Court was tasked with determining whether expiry of 28-year lease automatically vested title in employer-lessee under Section 32I(2), City of Bombay Improvement Act, 1898 read with Section 51(2), City of Bombay Improvement Trust Transfer Act, 1925.
14 Mar 2022This writ petition, filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, concerned a dispute over the ownership of land and buildings comprised in C.S...
- 23
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Transfer Applications Under Section 24 CPC in Defamation Suits Filed by Charitable Trust Against Journalists and Activists. Applicants Sought Transfer from Goa to Maharashtra Citing Safety Threats and Hostile Environment at Plaintiff's Headquarters.
3 Sep 2025The judgment excerpt from the High Court of Judicature at Bombay records the hearing of five Miscellaneous Civil Applications filed under Section 24 o...
- 15
High Court
High Court of Bombay Examines Maintainability of Writ Petitions Against Air India Limited After Change in Status. Employees Challenge Dismissal, Stay of Orders, and Pension Scheme Cut-off Date, but Court Questions Whether Employer Remains Amenable to Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226.
25 Aug 2025These three writ petitions were filed by employees of Air India Limited (AIL) seeking distinct reliefs against their employer. Writ Petition No.1876 o...
- 10
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Validity of Explanations to Rule 38 of MCR, 2016 and Rule 45(8)(a) of MCDR, 2017 — Royalty Computation on Gross Sale Value Without Deduction of Royalty, DMF, and NMET Contributions is Valid. The Court held that royalty is a tax and not a contractual consideration, and the impugned explanations do not violate Article 14 or Article 265 of the Constitution.
15 Nov 2024The petitioners, Kirloskar Ferrous Industries Limited and another, filed a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution challenging the validity...
- 483
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Writ Petition in Land Conversion Case Due to Non-Compliance with Policy Conditions. Petitioner's Claim for Leasehold to Freehold Conversion Failed as Land Area and Capital Investment Did Not Meet Mandatory Requirements Under Uttar Pradesh Tourism Policy, 2013.
17 Mar 2023The dispute arose from a writ petition filed by a company challenging the order dated 24.01.2022 issued by respondent No. 1, which rejected its propos...
- 268
