Bombay High Court Hears Criminal Appeals Against Conviction of Police Officers for Custodial Death and Fabrication of Suicide. Trial Court Found Accused Guilty Under Sections 302, 342, 220, 120-B IPC for Illegal Detention, Assault, and Hanging of Deceased to Cover Up Custodial Killing.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: GOA
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Bombay High Court at Goa heard criminal appeals filed by two convicted police officers against their conviction and sentence for the custodial death of one Dattu Naik Dessai. The case stemmed from an incident on 27 June 2001, when the deceased was brought to Cuncolim Police Station following a complaint of assault. The prosecution alleged that the appellant-accused, Assistant Police Inspector Shripati Dessai and Head Constable Madhu Dessai, along with two other constables, illegally detained the deceased in the female lock-up without formal arrest and assaulted him, leading to his death. To cover up the crime, the accused allegedly hanged the body on a tree behind the police station to simulate suicide. The trial court, in Sessions Case No. 29/02, convicted the accused under Sections 302, 342, 220 read with 120-B of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced them to life imprisonment. The appeals challenged the conviction on grounds not detailed in the present excerpt. The prosecution’s case highlighted the violation of D.K. Basu guidelines, the absence of a formal complaint justifying arrest, and the medical evidence contradicting suicide. The High Court’s analysis and final decision are not included in this portion of the judgment, which only sets out the prosecution’s narrative and the charges framed.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Custodial Death - Murder - Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302 read with 120-B - The prosecution alleged that the accused police officers, after illegally detaining the deceased and assaulting him, caused his death and staged a hanging to portray suicide. The trial court convicted the accused under Section 302 for murder, finding that the death occurred within the police station premises due to brutal assault. (Paras 2-3, 6)

B) Criminal Law - Illegal Detention and Abuse of Authority - Indian Penal Code, 1860, Sections 342, 220 - The accused, having legal authority to confine persons, maliciously confined the deceased in the female lock-up without formal arrest or entry in the station diary, thereby committing wrongful confinement and acting contrary to law. This violated D.K. Basu guidelines on arrest and detention. (Paras 3, 6)

C) Criminal Procedure - Inquest and Investigation - Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Section 174 - A U.D. case was registered under Section 174 CrPC after an anonymous call reported the body hanging. The post-mortem revealed multiple bruises inconsistent with suicidal hanging, leading to registration of a CID case for murder and related offences. (Paras 5, 10)

D) Criminal Conspiracy - Common Intention - Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 120-B - The accused were charged with criminal conspiracy to wrongfully restrain, assault, and murder the deceased, and to cover up the crime by fabricating a suicide. The charge alleged a prior agreement and concerted action among the police personnel. (Para 6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the prosecution established beyond reasonable doubt that the accused police officers committed the offences of murder, illegal detention, and other charges in relation to the custodial death of Dattu Dessai, and whether the trial court's conviction was sustainable.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Law Points

  • custodial death
  • illegal detention
  • D.K. Basu guidelines violation
  • murder
  • criminal conspiracy
  • official misconduct
  • fabrication of suicide
  • abuse of authority
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2011 LawText (BOM) (05) 43

Criminal Appeals No. 59 & 60 of 2008

2011-05-06

S.C. Dharmadhikari, F.M. Reis

2011:BHC-GOA:1191-DB

S.G. Dessai, Pavithran A.V., S.D. Lotlikar, H. Kankonkar, S.R. Rivonkar

Madhu Dessai and Shripati Dessai

State of Goa (CID Crime Branch, Panaji) and Shripati Dessai (in Cr.A. No. 59/2008)

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeals against conviction for custodial death and related offences.

Remedy Sought

Appellants sought to set aside their conviction and sentences imposed by the trial court.

Filing Reason

Challenging the trial court's judgment of conviction and sentence in Sessions Case No. 29/02.

Previous Decisions

The Additional Sessions Judge, South Goa, Margao, convicted the accused in Sessions Case No. 29/02 on 24-26 November 2008.

Issues

Whether the prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt the charge of murder under Section 302 IPC. Whether the detention of the deceased was illegal and amounted to wrongful confinement under Sections 342 and 220 IPC. Whether the accused acted in criminal conspiracy under Section 120-B IPC. Whether the evidence sufficiently established the accused's role in fabricating the suicide.

Submissions/Arguments

Prosecution argued that the accused, as police officers, illegally detained the deceased, assaulted him, and later hanged the body to simulate suicide, violating D.K. Basu guidelines and committing murder.

Judgment Excerpts

they caused death of one Dattu alias Murgesh Anant Naik Dessai within the precincts of this Police Station. the Deceased was not formally arrested, and as such, his detention in the lock-up was illegal. the guidelines of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of D.K. Basu vs. State of West Bengal were violated. Injury No.13 was on account of blue check design shirt tied around the neck with knots.

Procedural History

On 27 June 2001, the deceased was brought to Cuncolim Police Station and allegedly died after illegal detention and assault. On 29 June 2001, the body was found hanging behind the police station. An FIR was registered on 16 July 2001. On 26 February (likely 2002), charges were framed against the accused. The trial in Sessions Case No. 29/02 concluded with conviction on 24-26 November 2008. The accused filed Criminal Appeals No. 59 and 60 of 2008, which were heard and judgment reserved on 21 April 2011, and pronounced on 6 May 2011 by the High Court of Bombay at Goa.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 120-B, 342, 302, 220, 201
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 2(o), 174
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Pre-Execution Challenge to Detention Orders Under COFEPOSA; Maintainability of Writ Petitions and Grounds for Interference are Limited to Five Exhaustive Grounds as per Gadia’s Case. Court Rejects Reques...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Revenue Appeal in Central Excise Valuation Case — Related Party Transactions Must Be Valued Under Rule 11 CEVR Read with Section 4(1)(b) of Central Excise Act, 1944. Circular dated 01.07.2002 Clarifying Valuation Method for Mix...