Search Results for "superintendence jurisdiction"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "superintendence jurisdiction"

573 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 573 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Clarifies That Appeal Under Section 72(4) of Bombay Public Trusts Act is a Regular Appeal Not Subject to Section 100 CPC Limitations. Full Bench Holds That Such Appeal Permits Full Rehearing on Both Facts and Law, Overruling Earlier Division Bench View That It is a Second Appeal Requiring Substantial Questions of Law.

1 Apr 2016

The dispute originated from two rival Change Reports filed under the Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950, concerning the management committee of a public t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Recall of Witness for Cross-Examination in Civil Suit — Procedural Rules Subserve Justice. Inherent powers under Section 151 CPC can be invoked to recall a witness for cross-examination when counsel was delayed due to unavoidable circumstances, as rules of procedure are handmaids of justice.

12 Oct 2018

The petitioner, Michelle Rejji Cope, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the trial court refusing to recall a witness for cross-examination...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Sarpanch's Challenge to No-Confidence Motion — Non-Service of Requisition Copy Not Fatal Under Section 35 of Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1958. Service of Notice Under Section 35 Read with Rule 2 of No-Confidence Rules Held Sufficient Compliance.

8 Aug 2024

The petitioner, Smt. Amrapali Sakharam Kamble, was elected as Sarpanch of Mhasrang Gram Panchayat on 26th February 2021. She remained absent from meet...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Writ Petitions Challenging Cooperative Court Orders in Loan Recovery Disputes. Held that the Cooperative Court had jurisdiction under Section 91 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, and the bank had an alternative remedy of appeal under Section 97, making the writ petitions not maintainable.

2 May 2016

The petitioner, Pune Zilla Madhyavarti Sahakari Bank Ltd., filed multiple writ petitions challenging orders passed by the Cooperative Court in dispute...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Gujarat High Court's Order Requiring Certificate for Letters Patent Appeal. Single Judge Judgment in Transferred First Appeal Held Appealable Without Certificate Under Clause 15 of Letters Patent After Merger of Saurashtra High Court.

16 Sep 1969

The dispute arose out of a civil suit for recovery of money filed by the appellant in 1951 in a court in Saurashtra. The suit was decreed by the trial...

High Court

Bombay High Court Deliberates on Applicability of Limitation Act to Appeals Before Collector Under Section 137 of Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949. Issue Centered on Whether Collector is a 'Court' for the Purpose of Section 29(2) of the Indian Limitation Act, 1963.

21 Dec 2006

The writ petition arose from a demand notice dated 23 June 2003 issued to the petitioner, proprietress of Vishal Liquors, an ex-CLII licensee, for an ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Decree Holder to Execute Two Separate Decrees in Single Execution Petition Under Order 21 Rule 11 CPC — No Bar Against Combining Claims in Execution. The court set aside the executing court's order directing amendment to restrict claim to one transaction, holding that CPC does not prohibit combining multiple decrees in one execution petition.

29 Apr 2016

The petitioner, PAFCO 2916 Inc., a company incorporated in the USA, obtained two separate decrees against the respondent, Kingfisher Airlines Limited,...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Civil Revision Petitions Challenging Interlocutory Orders Rejecting Applications Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC in Commercial Suit. Revisions Under Section 115 CPC Barred by Section 8 of Commercial Courts Act, 2015 and Counterclaim Against Co-Defendant Maintainable if It Concerns Plaintiff’s Rights.

25 Nov 2025

The High Court of Karnataka dealt with two civil revision petitions arising out of commercial suits filed by HDFC Bank Ltd. (plaintiff) against a borr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of OBC Reservation in Local Bodies — Directs State to Conduct Elections with OBC Reservation Based on Empirical Data. The court held that reservation for OBCs in Zilla Parishads and Municipal Councils must be based on quantifiable data regarding backwardness and inadequate representation, as mandated by Article 243D and Article 243T of the Constitution of India.

1 Apr 2021

The judgment pertains to a batch of writ petitions filed before the Bombay High Court challenging the validity of the reservation for Other Backward C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Wife's Transfer Petition Under Section 24 CPC Seeking Transfer of DV Act Case to Family Court — Metropolitan Magistrate Not Subordinate to High Court Under CPC. Transfer Under Article 227 Also Denied as Proceedings Were at Advanced Stage and No Prejudice Shown.

10 Dec 2015

The applicant wife filed a Miscellaneous Civil Application under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, and also invoked Article 227 of the ...

13 14 15 16 17

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)