Search Results for "statutory preconditions"

162 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 162 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Petition for Regularisation of Daily Wager in Industrial Dispute — No Employer-Employee Relationship Established with State. Claim for Regularisation Fails as Petitioner Worked Under Private Contractor, Not Under State or Its Instrumentality.

The petitioner, Rajesh Anantray Ravl, filed a Special Civil Application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the Gujarat Hig...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Stamp Duty on Renewal of Perpetual Lease Under Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958. Levy of stamp duty on renewal of perpetual lease is not manifestly arbitrary or violative of Articles 14 and 300A of the Constitution of India.

The Bombay High Court at Nagpur, through a division bench comprising Justices Anil S. Kilor and Rajnish R. Vyas, dismissed two writ petitions challeng...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Tender Cancellation in Sandranol Procurement Dispute — Violation of Natural Justice and Arbitrary Action. Tender Cancellation Order Set Aside as Issued Without Show Cause Notice and Based on Unsubstantiated Allegations of Price Manipulation.

The petitioner, M/s. Bannari Constructions, a distributor of perfumeries including Sandranol, challenged the cancellation of a tender floated by Karna...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Tender Notification for Borewell Drilling Due to Unreasonable Local District Restriction — Condition Restricting Participation to Contractors of Chitradurga District Held Arbitrary and Violative of Article 14 of Constitution of India.

The petitioners, who are contractors engaged in drilling borewells, challenged a communication dated 02-11-2023 from the Department of Backward Classe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Court Fees in Suit Settled by Consent Terms. The phrase 'claim for repayment' in Section 43(1) proviso of Maharashtra Court Fees Act, 1959 refers to the application to the court for refund order, not the subsequent certificate application.

The suit was filed in 2014 by Bai Mamubai Bhimji Bhanji Trust and others against Neelkanth Mansions & Infrastructure Pvt Ltd. On 28 October 2014, the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Bidder Qualification in Tender Process — Debarment by One State Does Not Automatically Disqualify in Another State's Tender Without Specific Clause in Tender Document.

The Petitioner, Smart Chip Pvt. Ltd., filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the decision of Respondent Nos....