Search Results for "specific reference"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "specific reference"

10142 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 10142 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Specific Performance — Agreement to Sell Not Proved as Execution and Attestation Were Not Established. The Court Held That the Plaintiff Failed to Discharge the Burden of Proof Under Section 16(c) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 and Section 68 of the Evidence Act, 1872.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioner, Jayprakash Sitaram Goel, filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell dated 1st May 1995 and for permanent injunction...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Delivers Judgment in Two Regular First Appeals Against Common Decree for Specific Performance of Agreements of Sale of Immovable Property. The Appellants Contended That the Agreements Were Sham and Without Consideration, While the Respondents Claimed Breach of the Right of Pre-emption Under a Lease Deed.

3 Feb 2023

The appeals before the High Court of Karnataka arose from two suits (O.S. No. 6281/1994 and O.S. No. 4361/1997) filed for specific performance of two ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Second Appeal and Upholds First Appellate Court’s Decree for Specific Performance in Property Sale Agreement. Failure to Appoint Guardian-ad-Litem for Minor Defendant and Non-Challenge to Subsequent Sale Deeds Are Key Issues Under Section 100 CPC.

20 Sep 2019

The Second Appeal arose from a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell immovable property. The plaintiff (respondent no.1) claimed that ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment of Subsequent Purchaser in Suit for Specific Performance — Transfer of Property Act, 1882 Section 52 Does Not Bar Transfer Pendente Lite, But Purchaser Must Be Heard Before Final Decree. The court held that a subsequent purchaser of suit property is a necessary and proper party under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC, and amendment of plaint under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC to incorporate subsequent events should be allowed.

9 Oct 2014

The appeal arises from a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell a property. The original plaintiffs (appellants) filed Suit No.1241 of ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Executability of Specific Performance Decree Despite Delay in Deposit of Balance Consideration. Non-Deposit Within Stipulated Time Does Not Automatically Render Decree Inexecutable; Judgment-Debtor Must Seek Rescission Under Section 28 of Specific Relief Act, 1963.

6 May 2026

The case involves a dispute over the execution of a decree for specific performance of an agreement to sell agricultural land. The appellant, Habban S...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Rules on Arbitration Petition No.846 of 2014 Under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act. The Court Considers Whether the Arbitral Award Dated 22 March 2014 Should Be Set Aside in Light of Various Share Sale Agreements Between the Parties.

24 Apr 2015

The matter before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay arose from an arbitration petition filed by Haresh Advani under Section 34 of the Arbitration...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Plaint in SARFAESI Act Dispute — Civil Suit Barred Under Section 34 of SARFAESI Act, 2002. Shareholder's Allegations of Fraud Do Not Override Statutory Bar When Secured Assets Are Involved.

15 Oct 2024

The petitioner, Shashikant Gangar, a shareholder and director of Libox Chem (India) Private Limited (respondent no. 2), filed a writ petition challeng...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses NCDC's Appeals in Income Tax Deduction Case — Dividends, Interest, and Service Charges Not 'Derived From' Long-Term Finance Business. The Court held that the restrictive phrase 'derived from' in Section 36(1)(viii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, excludes ancillary income such as dividends, interest on deposits, and service charges from the deduction.

30 Nov -0001

The Supreme Court dismissed a batch of appeals filed by the National Cooperative Development Corporation (NCDC) against the Assistant Commissioner of ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Case: Order II Rule 2 CPC Bar Applies to Subsequent Suit for Specific Performance When Relief of Permanent Injunction Was Sought in Previous Suit. The Court held that the plaintiff's entitlement to seek specific performance existed at the time of the first suit, and failure to include it bars the second suit under Order II Rule 2 CPC.

17 Jan 2025

The dispute arose from an agreement for sale dated 24.01.2007 between M/s Chemplast Cuddalore Vinyls Limited (respondent no.1/original plaintiff) and ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Considers Challenge to Arbitral Award in Construction Subcontract Dispute. Petition filed by main contractor against subcontractor's award under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

21 Mar 2013

Patel Engineering Co. Ltd (PEC) challenged an arbitral award dated 25 January 2010 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 in t...

13 14 15 16 17

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)