Search Results for "reopen assessment"

386 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 386 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Reopening of Assessment Beyond Four Years Under Section 147 of Income Tax Act, 1961 — No Failure to Disclose Material Facts. Reopening Based on Change of Opinion Not Permissible; Notice Under Section 148 Quashed.

The petitioner, Hasmukh Estates Pvt. Ltd., a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956/2013, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Con...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Fresh Material. Gift of Property by Company to Director's Husband Held Not to be Income, as Assessee's Objections Were Not Properly Considered.

The petitioner, Bakhtawar Construction Co. Pvt. Ltd., a closely held company, challenged a notice dated 30 March 2013 issued under Section 148 of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice Under Section 148 of Income-tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Fresh Material. Assessment Reopened Beyond Four Years Based on Reappraisal of Same Facts Without Allegation of Failure to Disclose Material Facts Held Invalid.

The petitioner, CitiusTech Healthcare Technology Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging a notice dated 27 March 2021 issued under Section 148 of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Reasonable Belief and Change of Opinion. Reassessment Beyond Four Years Invalid Without Proof of Failure to Disclose Material Facts.

The petitioner, Vedanta Limited (formerly Sterlite Opportunities and Ventures Limited), challenged a notice dated 28 March 2008 issued under Section 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Fresh Material. Reopening Based on Mere Change of Opinion on Allowability of Sales Promotion and Physician Sample Expenses is Invalid.

The petitioner, Abbott India Limited (successor of Solvay Pharma India Ltd.), challenged a notice dated 27 March 2015 issued under Section 148 of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes High Court's Order in Tax Assessment Writ Petition Due to Statutory Remedy Foreclosure. High Court Exceeded Jurisdiction by Entertaining Writ Petition After Statutory Appeal Was Dismissed as Time-Barred Under Section 31 of the Andhra Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2005.

The dispute arose from a tax assessment order dated 21.6.2017 passed by the Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes against the respondent, a regis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Tax Appeal in Expenditure Tax Reassessment Case Due to Non-Compliance with Natural Justice Principles. Reassessment Order Set Aside for Failure to Furnish Reasons and Dispose Objections as Mandated by GKN Driveshaft.

The appellant, Fomento Resorts & Hotels Ltd., filed a return under the Expenditure Tax Act, 1987 for assessment year 1997-98 showing nil chargeable ex...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice in Income Tax Case Due to Change of Opinion. Reopening of Assessment Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Based on Mere Change of Opinion Without New Material is Invalid.

The petitioner, M/s. Rabo India Finance Limited, a non-banking financial company, challenged a notice dated 28.3.2011 issued under Section 148 of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Fresh Material Beyond Four Years. Reassessment Cannot Be Based Solely on Subsequent Year's Assessment Order Without Allegation of Failure to Disclose Material Facts.

The Petitioner, Sitara Diamond Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging a notice dated 20 June 2011 issued u...